» Articles » PMID: 12072486

On the Detection of Imprinted Quantitative Trait Loci in Experimental Crosses of Outbred Species

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2002 Jun 20
PMID 12072486
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, the quantitative genetic aspects of imprinted genes and statistical properties of methods to detect imprinted QTL are studied. Different models to detect imprinted QTL and to distinguish between imprinted and Mendelian QTL were compared in a simulation study. Mendelian and imprinted QTL were simulated in an F2 design and analyzed under Mendelian and imprinting models. Mode of expression was evaluated against the H(0) of a Mendelian QTL as well as the H(0) of an imprinted QTL. It was shown that imprinted QTL might remain undetected when analyzing the genome with Mendelian models only. Compared to testing against a Mendelian QTL, using the H(0) of an imprinted QTL gave a higher proportion of correctly identified imprinted QTL, but also gave a higher proportion of false inference of imprinting for Mendelian QTL. When QTL were segregating in the founder lines, spurious detection of imprinting became more prominent under both tests, especially for designs with a small number of F1 sires.

Citing Articles

Facial shape and allometry quantitative trait locus intervals in the Diversity Outbred mouse are enriched for known skeletal and facial development genes.

Katz D, Aponte J, Liu W, Green R, Mayeux J, Pollard K PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0233377.

PMID: 32502155 PMC: 7274373. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233377.


Scanning the genomes of parents for imprinted loci acting in their un-genotyped progeny.

Blunk I, Mayer M, Hamann H, Reinsch N Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):654.

PMID: 30679576 PMC: 6345920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36939-3.


Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting.

OBrien E, Wolf J Genetics. 2018; 211(1):75-88.

PMID: 30389806 PMC: 6325703. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301373.


Genome-wide random regression analysis for parent-of-origin effects of body composition allometries in mouse.

Zhao J, Li S, Wang L, Jiang L, Yang R, Cui Y Sci Rep. 2017; 7:45191.

PMID: 28338098 PMC: 5364555. DOI: 10.1038/srep45191.


Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.

Guo X, Christensen O, Ostersen T, Wang Y, Lund M, Su G Genet Sel Evol. 2016; 48(1):67.

PMID: 27623617 PMC: 5022243. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-016-0245-6.


References
1.
Clapcott S, Teale A, Kemp S . Evidence for genomic imprinting of the major QTL controlling susceptibility to trypanosomiasis in mice. Parasite Immunol. 2000; 22(5):259-63. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2000.00308.x. View

2.
de Koning D, Rattink A, Harlizius B, van Arendonk J, Brascamp E, Groenen M . Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(14):7947-50. PMC: 16650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.140216397. View

3.
Alleman M, Doctor J . Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications. Plant Mol Biol. 2000; 43(2-3):147-61. DOI: 10.1023/a:1006419025155. View

4.
Morison I, Paton C, Cleverley S . The imprinted gene and parent-of-origin effect database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 29(1):275-6. PMC: 29803. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.1.275. View

5.
Haley C, Knott S, Elsen J . Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics. 1994; 136(3):1195-207. PMC: 1205874. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.1195. View