» Articles » PMID: 12060690

Improved Detection of Small Deletions in Complex Pools of DNA

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2002 Jun 13
PMID 12060690
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

About 40% of the genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have homologs in humans. Based on the history of this model system, it is clear that the application of genetic methods to the study of this set of genes would provide important clues to their function in humans. To facilitate such genetic studies, we are engaged in a project to derive deletion alleles in every gene in this set. Our standard methods make use of nested PCR to hunt for animals in mutagenized populations that carry deletions at a given locus. The deletion bearing animals exist initially in mixed populations where the majority of the animals are wild type at the target. Therefore, the production of the PCR fragment representing the deletion allele competes with the production of the wild type fragment. The size of the deletion fragment relative to wild type determines whether it can compete to a level where it can be detected above the background. Using our standard conditions, we have found that when the deletion is <600 bp, the deletion fragment does not compete effectively with the production of the wild type fragment in PCR. Therefore, although our standard methods work well to detect mutants with deletions >600 bp, they do not work well to detect mutants with smaller deletions. Here we report a new strategy to detect small deletion alleles in complex DNA pools. Our new strategy is a modification of our standard PCR based screens. In the first round of the nested PCR, we include a third PCR primer between the two external primers. The presence of this third primer leads to the production of three fragments from wild type DNA. We configure the system so that two of these three fragments cannot serve as a template in the second round of the nested PCR. The addition of this third primer, therefore, handicaps the amplification from wild type template. On the other hand, the amplification of mutant fragments where the binding site for the third primer is deleted is unabated. Overall, we see at least a 500-fold increase in the sensitivity for small deletion fragments using our new method. Using this new method, we report the recovery of new deletion alleles within 12 C.elegans genes.

Citing Articles

RAG1/2 induces genomic insertions by mobilizing DNA into RAG1/2-independent breaks.

Rommel P, Oliveira T, Nussenzweig M, Robbiani D J Exp Med. 2017; 214(3):815-831.

PMID: 28179379 PMC: 5339680. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20161638.


Genomic Scars Generated by Polymerase Theta Reveal the Versatile Mechanism of Alternative End-Joining.

van Schendel R, van Heteren J, Welten R, Tijsterman M PLoS Genet. 2016; 12(10):e1006368.

PMID: 27755535 PMC: 5068794. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006368.


The application of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Xu S J Genet Genomics. 2015; 42(8):413-21.

PMID: 26336798 PMC: 4560834. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.06.005.


Dual sgRNA-directed gene knockout using CRISPR/Cas9 technology in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Chen X, Xu F, Zhu C, Ji J, Zhou X, Feng X Sci Rep. 2014; 4:7581.

PMID: 25531445 PMC: 4273605. DOI: 10.1038/srep07581.


UNC-6 (netrin) stabilizes oscillatory clustering of the UNC-40 (DCC) receptor to orient polarity.

Wang Z, Linden L, Naegeli K, Ziel J, Chi Q, Hagedorn E J Cell Biol. 2014; 206(5):619-33.

PMID: 25154398 PMC: 4151141. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201405026.


References
1.
Mitani S . Characterization of mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate, UV, and trimethylpsoralen in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 269(1):64-9. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2260. View

2.
Barstead R, Waterston R . Vinculin is essential for muscle function in the nematode. J Cell Biol. 1991; 114(4):715-24. PMC: 2289884. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.715. View

3.
Rushforth A, Saari B, Anderson P . Site-selected insertion of the transposon Tc1 into a Caenorhabditis elegans myosin light chain gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13(2):902-10. PMC: 358973. DOI: 10.1128/mcb.13.2.902-910.1993. View

4.
Liu L, Spoerke J, Mulligan E, Chen J, Reardon B, Westlund B . High-throughput isolation of Caenorhabditis elegans deletion mutants. Genome Res. 1999; 9(9):859-67. PMC: 310813. DOI: 10.1101/gr.9.9.859. View

5.
Jansen G, Hazendonk E, Thijssen K, Plasterk R . Reverse genetics by chemical mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet. 1997; 17(1):119-21. DOI: 10.1038/ng0997-119. View