» Articles » PMID: 12058055

Centrosome Reorientation in Wound-edge Cells is Cell Type Specific

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Cell
Date 2002 Jun 12
PMID 12058055
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reorientation of the microtubule organizing center during cell migration into a wound in the monolayer was directly observed in living wound-edge cells expressing gamma-tubulin tagged with green fluorescent protein. Our results demonstrate that in CHO cells, the centrosome reorients to a position in front of the nucleus, toward the wound edge, whereas in PtK cells, the centrosome lags behind the nucleus during migration into the wound. In CHO cells, the average rate of centrosome motion was faster than that of the nucleus; the converse was true in PtK cells. In both cell lines, centrosome motion was stochastic, with periods of rapid motion interspersed with periods of slower motion. Centrosome reorientation in CHO cells required dynamic microtubules and cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin activity and could be prevented by altering cell-to-cell or cell-to-substrate adhesion. Microtubule marking experiments using photoactivation of caged tubulin demonstrate that microtubules are transported in the direction of cell motility in both cell lines but that in PtK cells, microtubules move individually, whereas their movement is more coherent in CHO cells. Our data demonstrate that centrosome reorientation is not required for directed migration and that diverse cells use distinct mechanisms for remodeling the microtubule array during directed migration.

Citing Articles

DLGAP1 directs megakaryocytic growth and differentiation in an MPL dependent manner in hematopoietic cells.

Kwiatkowski B, Burwick N, Richard R Biomark Res. 2019; 7:13.

PMID: 31321035 PMC: 6615210. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-019-0165-z.


GNrep mouse: A reporter mouse for front-rear cell polarity.

Barbacena P, Ouarne M, Haigh J, Vasconcelos F, Pezzarossa A, Franco C Genesis. 2019; 57(6):e23299.

PMID: 30990965 PMC: 6618267. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23299.


Golgi Stabilization, Not Its Front-Rear Bias, Is Associated with EMT-Enhanced Fibrillar Migration.

Natividad R, Lalli M, Muthuswamy S, Asthagiri A Biophys J. 2018; 115(10):2067-2077.

PMID: 30366626 PMC: 6343588. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.10.006.


Multicompartment cell-based modeling of confined migration: regulation by cell intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

Kumar S, Das A, Sen S Mol Biol Cell. 2018; 29(13):1599-1610.

PMID: 29718766 PMC: 6080655. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E17-05-0313.


Control of endothelial cell polarity and sprouting angiogenesis by non-centrosomal microtubules.

Martin M, Veloso A, Wu J, Katrukha E, Akhmanova A Elife. 2018; 7.

PMID: 29547120 PMC: 5898915. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.33864.


References
1.
Vasquez R, Howell B, Yvon A, Wadsworth P, Cassimeris L . Nanomolar concentrations of nocodazole alter microtubule dynamic instability in vivo and in vitro. Mol Biol Cell. 1997; 8(6):973-85. PMC: 305707. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.8.6.973. View

2.
Forscher P, Smith S . Actions of cytochalasins on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules in a neuronal growth cone. J Cell Biol. 1988; 107(4):1505-16. PMC: 2115246. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1505. View

3.
Euteneuer U, Schliwa M . Mechanism of centrosome positioning during the wound response in BSC-1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1992; 116(5):1157-66. PMC: 2289366. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1157. View

4.
Bre M, Pepperkok R, Hill A, Levilliers N, Ansorge W, Stelzer E . Regulation of microtubule dynamics and nucleation during polarization in MDCK II cells. J Cell Biol. 1990; 111(6 Pt 2):3013-21. PMC: 2116395. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.3013. View

5.
Compton D . Focusing on spindle poles. J Cell Sci. 1998; 111 ( Pt 11):1477-81. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.111.11.1477. View