Model-based Technique for the Measurement of Skin Thickness in Mammography

Overview

Journal Med Biol Eng Comput

Publisher Springer

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Medical Informatics

Date 2002 Jun 5

PMID 12043795

Citations 1

Authors

A Katartzis

H Sahli

J Cornelis

S Fotopoulos

G Panayiotakis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A model-based method is proposed for the measurement of breast skin thickness from digitised mammograms that takes into account both the geometric and radiographic properties of the skin region. The method initially identifies a salient feature that discriminates the skin from the other anatomical structures of the breast. Its identification is based on a multi-scale grey-level gradient estimation, using a wavelet decomposition of the image. The spatial distribution of this feature is organised as a graph, with each of its nodes associated with a binary set of interpretation labels. A Markov random field is defined on the set of labels, and the best graph labelling is finally determined with a maximum a posteriori (MAP) probability criterion. The method was applied on 11 mammograms with improved contrast characteristics at the breast periphery, obtained by an exposure equalisation technique during image acquisition. The validation of the approach was performed by calculating the root mean square (RMS) error between the detected skin thickness and manual measurements performed on each of the films. The resulting error values ranged from 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm for normal cases and reached a maximum of 0.5mm in pathological cases with advanced skin thickening.

Citing Articles

Lens opacity detection for serious posterior subcapsular cataract.

Zhang W, Li H Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016; 55(5):769-779.

PMID: 27491802 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1554-1.

References

Skiadopoulos S, Pierrakeas C, Costaridou L, Kalogeropoulou C, Panayiotakis G . A phantom-based evaluation of an exposure equalization technique in mammography. Br J Radiol. 2000; 72(862):977-85. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.862.10673949. View

Davies D, Dance D . The automatic computer detection of subtle calcifications in radiographically dense breasts. Phys Med Biol. 1992; 37(6):1385-90. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/6/014. View

Byng J, Critten J, Yaffe M . Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images. Radiology. 1997; 203(2):564-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114122. View

Kocsis O, Costaridou L, Efstathopoulos E, Lymberopoulos D, Panayiotakis G . A tool for designing digital test objects for module performance evaluation in medical digital imaging. Med Inform Internet Med. 2000; 24(4):291-308. DOI: 10.1080/146392399298311. View

Canny J . A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011; 8(6):679-98. View

Panayiotakis G, Likaki H, Kolitsi Z, Dimopoulos J . An anatomical filter for exposure equalization in mammography. Eur J Radiol. 1992; 15(1):15-7. DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(92)90195-f. View

Mendez A, Tahoces P, Lado M, Souto M, Correa J, Vidal J . Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996; 49(3):253-62. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(96)01724-5. View

Stefanoyiannis A, Costaridou L, Sakellaropoulos P, Panayiotakis G . A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography. Br J Radiol. 2000; 73(868):410-20. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844867. View

Chandrasekhar R, Attikiouzel Y . A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997; 16(5):483-94. DOI: 10.1109/42.640738. View

10.

Sabol J, Plewes D . Analytical description of the high and low contrast behavior of a scan-rotate geometry for equalization mammography. Med Phys. 1996; 23(6):887-98. DOI: 10.1118/1.597731. View

11.

Veldkamp W, Karssemeijer N . Normalization of local contrast in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 19(7):731-8. DOI: 10.1109/42.875197. View

12.

Highnam R, BRADY J, Shepstone B . Mammographic image analysis. Eur J Radiol. 1997; 24(1):20-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01110-2. View

13.

Panayiotakis G, Skiadopoulos S, Solomou E, Pierrakeas C, Costaridou L, Kalogeropoulou C . Evaluation of an anatomical filter-based exposure equalization technique in mammography. Br J Radiol. 1999; 71(850):1049-57. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.71.850.10211065. View

14.

Pope Jr T, Read M, Medsker T, Buschi A, Brenbridge A . Breast skin thickness: normal range and causes of thickening shown on film-screen mammography. J Can Assoc Radiol. 1984; 35(4):365-8. View

15.

Bick U, Giger M, Schmidt R, Nishikawa R, Doi K . Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics. 1996; 16(6):1403-11. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.6.8946544. View

16.

Lam K, Chan H . Effects of x-ray beam equalization on mammographic imaging. Med Phys. 1990; 17(2):242-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.596502. View

17.

Costaridou L, Sakellaropoulos P, Stefanoyiannis A, Ungureanu E, Panayiotakis G . Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis. Br J Radiol. 2001; 74(886):913-9. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.74.886.740913. View

18.

Oestmann J, Stoel B, Schrijverhof M, Vrooman H . Scanning equalization mammography: preliminary evaluation. Radiographics. 1994; 14(1):123-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.14.1.8128044. View

19.

Bick U, Giger M, Schmidt R, Nishikawa R, Wolverton D, Doi K . Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995; 2(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(05)80239-9. View

20.

Yin F, Giger M, Doi K, Metz C, Vyborny C, Schmidt R . Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. Med Phys. 1991; 18(5):955-63. DOI: 10.1118/1.596610. View