» Articles » PMID: 12042402

Neuromuscular Blockers--a Means of Palliation?

Overview
Journal J Med Ethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2002 Jun 4
PMID 12042402
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As we die, our respiratory pattern is altered and we seem to gasp and struggle for each breath. Such gasping is commonly seen as a clear sign of dyspnoea and suffering by families and loved ones, however, it is unclear whether it is perceived at all by the dying person. Narcotics and sedatives do not seem to affect these gasping respirations. In this issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics, we are asked to consider whether the last gasp of a dying patient could be or, perhaps, even should be avoided by administering neuromuscular blockers to palliate dying patients. For many reasons, such as our current failure to alleviate pain and distress, stories of inadequate analgesia and sedation in critically ill paralysed patients and the inability to know the intent-whether to palliate or to euthanise-it would seem that administering neuromuscular blockers should not be ethically permissible.

Citing Articles

Dutch pediatricians' views on the use of neuromuscular blockers for dying neonates: a qualitative study.

ten Cate K, van de Vathorst S J Perinatol. 2015; 35(7):497-502.

PMID: 25611792 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.238.


Ethical reflections on end-of-life signs and symptoms in the intensive care setting: a place for neuromuscular blockers?.

Daubin C, Haddad L, Folscheid D, Boyer A, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Guisset O Ann Intensive Care. 2014; 4:17.

PMID: 25045580 PMC: 4098689. DOI: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-23.


Internists' attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care.

Kaldjian L, Jekel J, Bernene J, Rosenthal G, Vaughan-Sarrazin M, Duffy T J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(5):499-503.

PMID: 15467087 PMC: 1733924. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004895.

References
1.
Quill T, Dresser R, Brock D . The rule of double effect--a critique of its role in end-of-life decision making. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(24):1768-71. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199712113372413. View

2.
Burt R . The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(17):1234-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199710233371712. View

3.
Boyle J . Who is entitled to double effect?. J Med Philos. 1991; 16(5):475-94; discussion 511-4. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/16.5.475. View

4.
Perkin R, Resnik D . The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?. J Med Ethics. 2002; 28(3):164-9. PMC: 1733591. DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.3.164. View

5.
Street K, Henderson J . Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Are we treading a fine line?. BMJ. 2001; 323(7309):388-9. PMC: 1120983. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.388. View