When Debiasing Backfires: Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences in Debiasing Hindsight
Overview
Affiliations
Two studies demonstrated that attempts to debias hindsight by thinking about alternative outcomes may backfire and traced this to the influence of subjective accessibility experiences. Participants listed either few (2) or many (10) thoughts about how an event might have turned out otherwise. Listing many counterfactual thoughts was experienced as difficult and consistently increased the hindsight bias, presumably because the experienced difficulty suggested that there were not many ways in which the event might have turned out otherwise. No significant hindsight effects were obtained when participants listed only a few counterfactual thoughts, a task subjectively experienced as easy. The interplay of accessible content and subjective accessibility experiences in the hindsight bias is discussed.
Guided Reflection Interventions Show No Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy in Medical Students.
Lambe K, Hevey D, Kelly B Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2297.
PMID: 30532723 PMC: 6265413. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02297.
Complexity in simulation-based education: exploring the role of hindsight bias.
Motavalli A, Nestel D Adv Simul (Lond). 2018; 1:3.
PMID: 29449972 PMC: 5796605. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-015-0005-7.
Bernstein D, Wilson A, Pernat N, Meilleur L Psychon Bull Rev. 2012; 19(4):588-93.
PMID: 22648656 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0268-0.
"If only" counterfactual thoughts about exceptional actions.
Dixon J, Byrne R Mem Cognit. 2011; 39(7):1317-31.
PMID: 21547605 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0101-4.
Lau A, Coiera E J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 16(1):54-65.
PMID: 18952948 PMC: 2605604. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2557.