» Articles » PMID: 11992247

A Rheostat Model for a Rapid and Reversible Form of Imprinting-dependent Evolution

Overview
Journal Am J Hum Genet
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Genetics
Date 2002 May 7
PMID 11992247
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The evolutionary advantages of genomic imprinting are puzzling. We propose that genomic imprinting evolved as a mechanism that maximizes the interindividual variability in the rates of gene expression for dosage-sensitive loci that, with minimal unrelated deleterious effects, can alter the phenotype over a wide continuum. We hypothesize (1) that genomic imprinting provides a previously suggested haploid selective advantage (HSA); (2) that many imprinted genes have evolved mechanisms that facilitate quantitative hypervariability (QH) of gene expression; (3) that the combination of HSA and QH makes possible a rapid and reversible form of imprinting-dependent evolution (IDE) that can mediate changes in phenotype; and (4) that this enhanced adaptability to a changing environment provides selective advantage to the population, as an assisted form of evolution. These mechanisms may have provided at least one of the driving forces for the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. The rheostat model suggests that both genetic and epigenetic variants can contribute to an integrated mechanism of mixed Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance and suggests the possibility that the majority of variants are not intrinsically deleterious but, depending on the environment, are each potentially advantageous. Moreover, this would be a reversible form of evolution, with the ability not only to protect a silent allele from selection for many generations but to reactivate and expand it in the population quickly.

Citing Articles

Imprinting as Basis for Complex Evolutionary Novelties in Eutherians.

Schuff M, Strong A, Welborn L, Ziermann-Canabarro J Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 39336109 PMC: 11428813. DOI: 10.3390/biology13090682.


Maternal overnutrition programs hedonic and metabolic phenotypes across generations through sperm tsRNAs.

Sarker G, Sun W, Rosenkranz D, Pelczar P, Opitz L, Efthymiou V Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(21):10547-10556.

PMID: 31061112 PMC: 6534971. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820810116.


Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants.

Rodrigues J, Zilberman D Genes Dev. 2015; 29(24):2517-31.

PMID: 26680300 PMC: 4699382. DOI: 10.1101/gad.269902.115.


RNA-mediated paternal heredity of diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders.

Grandjean V, Fourre S, Fernandes De Abreu D, Derieppe M, Remy J, Rassoulzadegan M Sci Rep. 2015; 5:18193.

PMID: 26658372 PMC: 4677355. DOI: 10.1038/srep18193.


Perturbation of parentally biased gene expression during interspecific hybridization.

Burkart-Waco D, Ngo K, Lieberman M, Comai L PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0117293.

PMID: 25719202 PMC: 4342222. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117293.


References
1.
Morgan H, Sutherland H, Martin D, Whitelaw E . Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat Genet. 1999; 23(3):314-8. DOI: 10.1038/15490. View

2.
Boerkoel C, Inoue K, Reiter L, Warner L, Lupski J . Molecular mechanisms for CMT1A duplication and HNPP deletion. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999; 883:22-35. View

3.
Balter M . Genetics. Was Lamarck just a little bit right?. Science. 2000; 288(5463):38. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5463.38. View

4.
Sutherland H, Kearns M, Morgan H, Headley A, Morris C, Martin D . Reactivation of heritably silenced gene expression in mice. Mamm Genome. 2000; 11(5):347-55. DOI: 10.1007/s003350010066. View

5.
Bell A, Felsenfeld G . Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature. 2000; 405(6785):482-5. DOI: 10.1038/35013100. View