Linek L, Skvrnak M, Soltes M, Titl V
Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):302.
PMID: 39971953
PMC: 11840027.
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04617-5.
Villani C, De Muynck G, Borghi A, Lugli L, Winter B
Psychol Res. 2025; 89(2):55.
PMID: 39971808
PMC: 11839710.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02085-5.
Colas J, ODoherty J, Grafton S
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(3):e1011950.
PMID: 38552190
PMC: 10980507.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950.
Biesaga M, Nowak A
PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0296731.
PMID: 38241285
PMC: 10798477.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296731.
Castillo L, Leon-Villagra P, Chater N, Sanborn A
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(1):e1011739.
PMID: 38181041
PMC: 10796055.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011739.
Clarifying the nature of stochastic fluctuations and accumulation processes in spontaneous movements.
Bogler C, Grujicic B, Haynes J
Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1271180.
PMID: 37901069
PMC: 10602783.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271180.
Exploring randomness in autism.
Mantas V, Kotoula V, Pehlivanidis A
PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15751.
PMID: 37529214
PMC: 10389071.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15751.
Probabilistic integration of preceding responses explains response bias in perceptual decision making.
Schlunegger D, Mast F
iScience. 2023; 26(7):107123.
PMID: 37434696
PMC: 10331403.
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107123.
Instruction effects on randomness in sequence generation.
Guseva M, Bogler C, Allefeld C, Haynes J
Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1113654.
PMID: 37034908
PMC: 10075230.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113654.
The effects of careless responding on the fit of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory models.
Voss N
Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(2):577-599.
PMID: 36737580
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02074-9.
Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning.
Rao K, Hastie R
Cogn Sci. 2023; 47(1):e13211.
PMID: 36680427
PMC: 10078382.
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13211.
Position biases in sequential location selection: Effects of region, choice history, and visibility of previous selections.
Hubner R
PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0276207.
PMID: 36240249
PMC: 9565670.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276207.
Six of one, half dozen of the other: Suboptimal prioritizing for equal and unequal alternatives.
James W, Hunt A, Clarke A
Mem Cognit. 2022; 51(2):486-503.
PMID: 36223005
PMC: 9950175.
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01356-5.
Is it a judgment of representativeness? Re-examining the birth sequence problem.
Leong L, Muller-Trede J, McKenzie C
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(2):731-738.
PMID: 36219372
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02188-9.
Statistical Decision-Making Accuracies for Some Overlap- and Distance-based Measures for Single-Case Experimental Designs.
Carlin M, Costello M
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022; 45(1):187-207.
PMID: 35342864
PMC: 8894531.
DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00317-8.
The Effect of Context and Individual Differences in Human-Generated Randomness.
Biesaga M, Talaga S, Nowak A
Cogn Sci. 2021; 45(12):e13072.
PMID: 34913501
PMC: 9285827.
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13072.
Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching.
Brosowsky N, Egner T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(10):1329-1347.
PMID: 34766818
PMC: 8597921.
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000942.
Subpopulations of neurons in lOFC encode previous and current rewards at time of choice.
Hocker D, Brody C, Savin C, Constantinople C
Elife. 2021; 10.
PMID: 34693908
PMC: 8616578.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70129.
Characterizing human random-sequence generation in competitive and non-competitive environments using Lempel-Ziv complexity.
Wong A, Merholz G, Maoz U
Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):20662.
PMID: 34667239
PMC: 8526708.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99967-6.
Regular and random judgements are not two sides of the same coin: Both representativeness and encoding play a role in randomness perception.
Gronchi G, Sloman S
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(5):1707-1714.
PMID: 33959894
PMC: 8500893.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01934-9.