» Articles » PMID: 11958716

Complete Mitochondrial DNA Genome Sequences Show That Modern Birds Are Not Descended from Transitional Shorebirds

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2002 Apr 18
PMID 11958716
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To test the hypothesis put forward by Feduccia of the origin of modern birds from transitional birds, we sequenced the first two complete mitochondrial genomes of shorebirds (ruddy turnstone and blackish oystercatcher) and compared their sequences with those of already published avian genomes. When corrected for rate heterogeneity across sites and non-homogeneous nucleotide compositions among lineages in maximum likelihood (ML), the optimal tree places palaeognath birds as sister to the neognaths including shorebirds. This optimal topology is a re-rooting of recently published ordinal-level avian trees derived from mitochondrial sequences. Using a penalized likelihood (PL) rate-smoothing process in conjunction with dates estimated from fossils, we show that the basal splits in the bird tree are much older than the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary, reinforcing previous molecular studies that rejected the derivation of modern birds from transitional shorebirds. Our mean estimate for the origin of modern birds at about 123 million years ago (Myr ago) is quite close to recent estimates using both nuclear and mitochondrial genes, and supports theories of continental break-up as a driving force in avian diversification. Not only did many modern orders of birds originate well before the K-T boundary, but the radiation of major clades occurred over an extended period of at least 40 Myr ago, thus also falsifying Feduccia's rapid radiation scenario following a K-T bottleneck.

Citing Articles

Complete mitochondrial genome MK992912 of Great Knot () is a chimera with DNA from Pacific Golden Plover (Aves: Charadriiformes).

Sangster G, Luksenburg J Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2024; 9(4):532-535.

PMID: 38638190 PMC: 11025405. DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2024.2342932.


Complete mitochondrial genome of from India: phylogeny with other Larids.

Kundu S, Tyagi K, Alam I, Maheswaran G, Kumar V, Chandra K Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021; 6(2):339-343.

PMID: 33659671 PMC: 7872550. DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1866448.


Characterization of three new mitochondrial genomes of Coraciiformes (Megaceryle lugubris, Alcedo atthis, Halcyon smyrnensis) and insights into their phylogenetics.

Jing M, Yang H, Li K, Huang L Genet Mol Biol. 2020; 43(4):e20190392.

PMID: 33026411 PMC: 7539371. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0392.


The Prevalence and Impact of Model Violations in Phylogenetic Analysis.

Naser-Khdour S, Minh B, Zhang W, Stone E, Lanfear R Genome Biol Evol. 2019; 11(12):3341-3352.

PMID: 31536115 PMC: 6893154. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evz193.


The mitochondrial genome of pin-tailed snipe Gallinago stenura, and its implications for the phylogeny of Charadriiformes.

Hu C, Zhang C, Sun L, Zhang Y, Xie W, Zhang B PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0175244.

PMID: 28384231 PMC: 5383286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175244.


References
1.
Galtier N, Gouy M . Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15(7):871-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025991. View

2.
Kumar S . Patterns of nucleotide substitution in mitochondrial protein coding genes of vertebrates. Genetics. 1996; 143(1):537-48. PMC: 1207285. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/143.1.537. View

3.
Hedges S, Parker P, Sibley C, Kumar S . Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals. Nature. 1996; 381(6579):226-9. DOI: 10.1038/381226a0. View

4.
Desjardins P, Morais R . Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J Mol Biol. 1990; 212(4):599-634. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90225-B. View

5.
Chang B, Campbell D . Bias in phylogenetic reconstruction of vertebrate rhodopsin sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17(8):1220-31. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026405. View