» Articles » PMID: 11936547

Analysis of Response Covariationamong Multiple Topographies of Food Refusal

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2002 Apr 9
PMID 11936547
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the effects of sequentially introducing treatment across multiple topographies of food refusal. Treatment with nonremoval of the spoon produced an increase in food acceptance and a decrease in disruption, but expulsion of food increased. When expulsion was treated, packing of food increased. Finally, when packing was treated, all refusal behaviors remained low, and acceptance continued to occur at high and stable levels.

Citing Articles

Comparing Simultaneous and Sequential Food Presentation to Increase Consumption of Novel Target Foods.

Davis M, Slaton J, MacDonald J, Parry-Cruwys D Behav Anal Pract. 2023; 16(4):1124-1137.

PMID: 38076751 PMC: 10700282. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-023-00789-x.


Behavior Analytic Feeding Interventions: Current State of the Literature.

Williams K, Seiverling L Behav Modif. 2022; 47(4):983-1011.

PMID: 35674422 PMC: 10291736. DOI: 10.1177/01454455221098118.


Brief Report: Packing Treatment Comparison and Use of a Chaser to Increase Swallowing for a Clinical Case.

Taylor T J Autism Dev Disord. 2021; 52(7):3280-3285.

PMID: 34213699 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-021-05176-5.


Simultaneous Presentation to Decrease Packing in a Child With a Feeding Disorder.

Whipple H, Scherr R, Kozlowski A Behav Anal Pract. 2020; 13(1):197-204.

PMID: 32231981 PMC: 7070138. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-019-00360-7.


Evaluation of Empirical Pretreatment Assessments for Developing Treatments for Packing in Pediatric Feeding Disorders.

Rivero A, Borrero C Behav Anal Pract. 2020; 13(1):137-151.

PMID: 32231974 PMC: 7070114. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-019-00372-3.


References
1.
Magee S, Ellis J . Extinction effects during the assessment of multiple problem behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000; 33(3):313-6. PMC: 1284253. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-313. View

2.
McEntee J, Saunders R . A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997; 30(3):485-506. PMC: 1284064. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-485. View

3.
Ahearn W, Kerwin M, Eicher P, Shantz J, Swearingin W . An alternating treatments comparison of two intensive interventions for food refusal. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(3):321-32. PMC: 1283995. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-321. View

4.
SPRAGUE J, Horner R . Covariation within functional response classes: implications for treatment of severe problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992; 25(3):735-45. PMC: 1279755. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-735. View

5.
Lerman D, Iwata B . A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(2):231-3. PMC: 1279896. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-231. View