» Articles » PMID: 11928096

Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Osteotomy

Overview
Date 2002 Apr 3
PMID 11928096
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the transverse displacement of the proximal segment and ramus rotation after a bilateral sagittal osteotomy (BSO) with rigid internal fixation (RIF) using bicortical LAG screws.

Patients And Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 37 patients (14 males and 23 females, age range of 14 to 55 years) who underwent a mandibular advancement with BSO and RIF. Posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained 1 to 8 weeks before and 1 to 4 weeks after surgery. The transverse displacement and angulation of the proximal segments after surgery were measured on posteroanterior radiographs, using the best-fit method. The amount of mandibular advancement was compared with the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segments.

Results: In the 1 to 4-week postoperative period after a BSO, 36 of 37 subjects showed an increased transverse intergonion distance (5.6 mm) (P <.0001) and 35 of 37 patients showed an increased transverse interramus width (3.3 mm) (P <.0001). No correlation was found between mandibular advancement and transverse displacement of the proximal segment.

Conclusions: The study results indicate that transverse displacements of the proximal segments occur with BSO and RIF. The clinical impact on temporomandibular joint symptomatology or surgical relapse with such displacement was not assessed in the study. Future studies that address these issues may help to determine whether there is an association between proximal segment displacement and surgical relapse, temporomandibular dysfunction, or both.

Citing Articles

Ramal inclination in the frontal plane after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III facial asymmetry : Spontaneous changes and stability.

Park E, Ha A, Kim K, Park K, Kang Y J Orofac Orthop. 2021; 84(Suppl 2):37-44.

PMID: 34468850 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-021-00344-9.


Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Ehardt L, Ruellas A, Edwards S, Benavides E, Ames M, Cevidanes L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159(5):613-626.

PMID: 33712310 PMC: 8089060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.022.


The outcome of skeletofacial reconstruction with mandibular rotation for management of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity: A three-dimensional computer-assisted investigation.

Wu T, Denadai R, Lin H, Ho C, Lo L Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):13337.

PMID: 31527720 PMC: 6746777. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-49946-9.


Transverse Changes in Mandible Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Advancement.

Deshmukh T, Sahoo N J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019; 18(3):447-451.

PMID: 31371889 PMC: 6639501. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-018-1161-9.


Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.

Ma H, Shu J, Deng X, Liu Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(22):e15830.

PMID: 31145325 PMC: 6708877. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015830.