» Articles » PMID: 11910487

Factors Associated with Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leakage After Large Bowel Resection: Multivariate Analysis of 707 Patients

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2002 Mar 23
PMID 11910487
Citations 153
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine by univariate and multivariate analyses the factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage (AL) after large bowel resection. From 1990 to 1997 a series of 707 patients underwent colonic or rectal resection (without a stoma). Patients were divided into two groups: those with clinical anastomotic leakage (group 1) and those without it (group 2). AL occurred in 43 of 707 patients (6%). The overall mortality was 2.2% and was significantly higher in patients with AL than in those without: 5 of 43 (12%) versus 11 of 664 (1.6%), p < 0.001. Univariate analysis showed 15 variables associated with the risk of AL: previous abdominal or pelvic irradiation (p = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 2 (p = 0.04), leukocytosis (p = 0.02), renal failure (p = 0.03), steroid treatment (p = 0.01), duration of operation (p = 0.001), intraoperative septic conditions (p = 0.006), total colectomy (p = 0.009), transverse colectomy (p = 0.02), difficulties encountered during anastomosis (p = 0.001), ileorectal anastomosis (p = 0.02), colocolic anastomosis (p = 0.01), abdominal drainage (p = 0.05), and blood transfusion intraoperatively (p = 0.006) and postoperatively (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only preoperative leukocytosis (p = 0.04), intraoperative septic conditions (p = 0.001), difficulties encountered during anastomosis (p = 0.007), colocolic anastomosis (p = 0.004), and postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.0007) were independent factors associated with AL. The risk of AL increased from a range of 12% to 30% if one risk factor was present, to 38% with two factors, to 50% with three factors. After colorectal resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis, a temporary protective stoma is proposed in selected patients with high risk factors for AL, as observed in our study.

Citing Articles

Implementation of intraoperative procedures to prevent anastomotic leak in low anterior rectal resections: a pilot study for a novel technique to evaluate anastomotic vascularization.

Ortenzi M, Carsetti A, Picchetto A, DAmbrosio G, Casarotta E, Sartori A Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(3):1935-1944.

PMID: 39870829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11506-2.


Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices.

Harada T, Numata M, Atsumi Y, Fukuda T, Izukawa S, Suwa Y Surg Today. 2025; .

PMID: 39797981 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02988-7.


Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Almutairi F Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62432.

PMID: 39011204 PMC: 11249052. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62432.


Comparing extracorporeal, semi-extracorporeal, and intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: introducing a bridging technique for colorectal surgeons.

Cho H, Kim J, Kim W Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024; 107(1):42-49.

PMID: 38978687 PMC: 11227917. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.1.42.


Machine learning-based preoperative analytics for the prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a swiss pilot study.

Taha-Mehlitz S, Wentzler L, Angehrn F, Hendie A, Ochs V, Wolleb J Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(7):3672-3683.

PMID: 38777894 PMC: 11219450. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10926-4.