Preferences for Gender of Family Physician Among Canadian European-descent and South-Asian Immigrant Women
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate expressed preferences for family physician (FP) gender among Canadian European-descent (CED) and Canadian South-Asian (CSA) immigrant women.
Method: An 'on-site' survey was conducted in community-based institutions in Toronto in order to determine preferences for the gender of FP under various health care scenarios: overall health care; gender-sensitive examinations; emotional problems; general ailments; and life-threatening conditions.
Results: Ninety-four women responded to this survey (CED = 50, CSA = 44), response rate 77.3%. For all health care scenarios, CED and CSA women similarly expressed either a preference for a female FP or no preference. More than two-thirds of women preferred a female FP for gynaecological examinations (CED, 72.9%; CSA, 83.7%) or examinations with private body part exposure (CED, 72%; CSA, 81.8%). For 'emotional problems', half of the women preferred a female FP and the other half had no preference. A similar pattern was observed for 'overall health care', with some shift to female physician preference among CSA women (60.5%) compared with CED women (53.2%). For the 'overall health care' scenario, CED and CSA women who preferred a female FP had a higher frequency of seeing female physicians within the last 5 years (CED, P < or = 0.01; CSA, P < or = 0.05), and attributed 'positive' social skills more to female physicians (CED, P < or = 0.01; CSA, P < or = 0.01) compared with women with no preference for the gender of the FP. Yet, CED women with a female FP preference were more likely to have a concurrent female FP (P < or = 0.01), and to rate past experiences with female physicians as high (P < or = 0.01) and with male physicians as low (P < or = 0.05) compared with CED women with no preference. In the CSA group, women with a preference for a female FP were more likely to be unemployed (P < or = 0.01) and have low social support (P < or = 0.01).
Conclusions: Despite similar physician gender preference patterns, factors associated with these preferences show some differences between CED and CSA women.
Gender Preferences in Healthcare: A Study of Saudi Patients' Physician Preferences.
Alhomayani K, Bukhary H, Aljuaid F, Alotaibi T, Alqurashi F, Althobaiti K Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025; 19:295-303.
PMID: 39926247 PMC: 11806673. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S494766.
Rahim E, Rahim F, Anzaar H, Lalwani P, Jain B, Desai A J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(13):2560-2564.
PMID: 38943015 PMC: 11436665. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08902-8.
Satagopan J, Dharamdasani T, Mathur S, Kohler R, Bandera E, Kinney A PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0294170.
PMID: 37956167 PMC: 10642833. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294170.
Meister T, Foessleitner P, Breuer G, Winder F, Favero M, Friemann M Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 309(6):2669-2679.
PMID: 37695372 PMC: 11147860. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07202-6.
Experiences of Assyrian refugee women seeking care for chronic pain: a qualitative study.
Altun A, Brown H, Sturgiss E, Russell G Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):83.
PMID: 37158876 PMC: 10169379. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01891-w.