» Articles » PMID: 11881866

Optimizing Fluid Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery by On-line Monitoring of Left Ventricular Stroke Volume Variations. Comparison with Aortic Systolic Pressure Variations

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2002 Mar 8
PMID 11881866
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation causes changes in left ventricular preload leading to distinct variations in left ventricular stroke volume and systolic arterial pressure. Retrospective off-line quantification of systolic arterial pressure variations (SPV) has been validated as a sensitive method of predicting left ventricular response to volume administration. We report the real-time measurement of left ventricular stroke volume variations (SVV) by continuous arterial pulse contour analysis and compare it with off-line measurements of SPV in patients after cardiac surgery.

Methods: SVV and SPV were determined before and after volume loading with colloids in 20 mechanically ventilated patients.

Results: SVV and SPV decreased significantly after volume loading and were correlated (r=0.89; P<0.001). Changes in SVV and changes in SPV as a result of volume loading were also significantly correlated (r=0.85; P<0.005). Changes in SVV correlated significantly with changes in stroke volume index (SVI) (r=0.67; P<0.005) as did changes in SPV (r=0.56; P<0.05). SVV determined before volume loading correlated significantly with changes in SVI (R=0.67; P <0.005). Using receiver operating characteristics curves, the area under the curve was statistically greater for SVV (0.824; 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.64-1.0) and SPV (0.81; CI: 0.62-1.0) than for central venous pressure (0.451; CI: 0.17-0.74).

Conclusions: Monitoring of SVV enables real-time prediction and monitoring of the left ventricular response to preload enhancement in patients after cardiac surgery and is helpful for guiding volume therapy.

Citing Articles

Pressure- vs. volume-controlled ventilation and their respective impact on dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness: a cross-over animal study.

Zitzmann A, Bandorf T, Merz J, Muller-Graf F, Prutz M, Frenkel P BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1):320.

PMID: 37726649 PMC: 10507836. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02273-z.


Alteration autonomic control of cardiac function during hemodialysis predict cardiovascular outcomes in end stage renal disease patients.

Kao C, Tseng C, Lo M, Lin Y, Hsu C, Wu Y Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):18783.

PMID: 31827106 PMC: 6906395. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55001-4.


Pulse waveform hemodynamic monitoring devices: recent advances and the place in goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgical patients.

Hendy A, Bubenek S Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017; 23(1):55-65.

PMID: 28913477 PMC: 5505364. DOI: 10.21454/rjaic.7518.231.wvf.


Validity of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) Compared with Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness.

Rathore A, Singh S, Lamsal R, Taank P, Paul D Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017; 45(4):210-217.

PMID: 28868168 PMC: 5579214. DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.04568.


Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.

Sawa T, Kinoshita M, Kainuma A, Akiyama K, Naito Y, Kato H J Clin Monit Comput. 2016; 31(5):927-941.

PMID: 27492429 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9916-7.