» Articles » PMID: 11835586

Ubiquitin-dependent Sperm Quality Control Mechanism Recognizes Spermatozoa with DNA Defects As Revealed by Dual Ubiquitin-TUNEL Assay

Overview
Journal Mol Reprod Dev
Date 2002 Feb 9
PMID 11835586
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Defective mammalian spermatozoa become ubiquitinated during epididymal passage, a mechanism that may mark the abnormal spermatozoa for proteolytic destruction (Sutovsky et al., 2001a: J Cell Sci 114:1665-1675). It is not known how such spermatozoa are recognized by the epididymal ubiquitination pathway and whether there is a selection against certain types of sperm defects. We examined the relationship between sperm ubiqutination, lifelong sperm morphology and sperm DNA defects using a single chanel, ubiquitin-activated flow cytometric assay, and a dual, ubiquitin-TUNEL assay. Semen samples from nine service sires of good-to-average fertility were screened. A positive correlation was found between sperm ubiquitination and the average frequency of morphological semen abnormalities from field evaluations performed throughout the reproductive life of individual sires. Sample correlation coefficients were r=0.65 for primary (head and tail) and r=0.60 for total semen abnormalities in the single channel assay. In a dual assay, we found a high, positive correlation (r=0.93) between the ubiquitin-positive sperm and the TUNEL positive sperm. Substantial correlations (r=0.47-0.64) were observed when the measurements from these two respective assays were compared for individual sires. While anti-ubiquitin antibodies recognized most of the TUNEL-positive sperm cells, the TUNEL-positive spermatozoa represented only a subset (approximately 20-40%) of all ubiquitin-positive cells. It appears that the ubiquitin-dependent sperm quality control, residing in the epididymal epithelium, has the ability to detect spermatozoa with apoptotic or necrotic DNA, while spermatozoa with defects other than DNA fragmentation are also recognized and ubiquitinated.

Citing Articles

Biomarker-based human and animal sperm phenotyping: the good, the bad and the ugly†.

Sutovsky P, Hamilton L, Zigo M, Ortiz DAvila Assumpcao M, Jones A, Tirpak F Biol Reprod. 2024; 110(6):1135-1156.

PMID: 38640912 PMC: 11180624. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioae061.


The development of new biomarkers of spermatozoa quality in cattle.

Fallon L, Diaz-Miranda E, Hamilton L, Sutovsky P, Zigo M, Spencer T Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1258295.

PMID: 37901101 PMC: 10601460. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1258295.


Na/K-ATPase and Regulation of Sperm Function.

Thundathil J, Rajamanickam G, Kastelic J Anim Reprod. 2022; 15(Suppl 1):711-720.

PMID: 36249829 PMC: 9536046. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0024.


Testis-Specific Isoform of Na-K ATPase and Regulation of Bull Fertility.

Tiwari S, Rajamanickam G, Unnikrishnan V, Ojaghi M, Kastelic J, Thundathil J Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(14).

PMID: 35887284 PMC: 9317330. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147936.


Comprehensive Flow-Cytometric Quality Assessment of Ram Sperm Intended for Gene Banking Using Standard and Novel Fertility Biomarkers.

Vasicek J, Balazi A, Svoradova A, Vozaf J, Dujickova L, Makarevich A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(11).

PMID: 35682598 PMC: 9180808. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23115920.