» Articles » PMID: 11834415

Intraluminal Pressure Changes in Vivo in the Middle and Distal Pig Ureter During Propagation of a Peristaltic Wave

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2002 Feb 9
PMID 11834415
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To establish the characteristics of mechanical activity during ureteral peristalsis and unidirectional bolus transport, pressure changes in the middle and distal (juxtavesical and ureterovesical junction) porcine ureter were quantified in vivo.

Methods: Five female New Yorkshire pigs (50 to 60 kg) were studied under halothane anesthesia. The endoscopic approach was used to position an 8-channel 6 F perfusion catheter under direct vision into the distal ureter by way of the orifice. Ureteral activity was studied in two separate sessions at 1-week intervals. The pressure, propagation velocity, and length of the peristaltic waves were analyzed.

Results: The average maximal pressure in a not previously instrumented ureter amounted to 35.7 +/- 1.2 cm H(2)O in the mid-ureter, and decreased to 19.4 +/- 1.3 cm H(2)O in the juxtavesical ureter (P < 0.001) and further to 7.2 +/- 1.0 cm H(2)O (P < 0.001) in the submucosal segment. The propagation velocity of the peristaltic wave through the ureter was 2.1 +/- 1.3 cm/s. The length of the pressure peak was 5.9 +/- 1.6 cm.

Conclusions: A ureteral peristaltic contraction wave travels at approximately 2 cm/s and is approximately 6 cm long. It is responsible for the unidirectional transport of a urinary bolus and itself acts as an "active" antireflux mechanism. The maximal pressure in the lumen of the ureter decreased from proximally to distally, but remains sufficiently high at the ureterovesical junction to prevent retrograde urine leakage when the ureter empties its urinary bolus into the bladder and the orifice is open.

Citing Articles

Understanding and Managing Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections in Vesicoureteral Reflux: Insights Into Pathophysiology and Care.

Alyasi A, Alsaad D, Alshammary E, Abdulrahman A, Ghazwani M, Almuayrifi M Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76144.

PMID: 39835023 PMC: 11745421. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76144.


A tissue-engineered urinary conduit in a porcine urinary diversion model.

Jundzill A, Kwiecinski P, Balcerczyk D, Kloskowski T, Grzanka D, Antosik P Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16754.

PMID: 34408168 PMC: 8373918. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94613-7.


Physiopathology of vesico-ureteral reflux.

Arena S, Iacona R, Impellizzeri P, Russo T, Marseglia L, Gitto E Ital J Pediatr. 2016; 42(1):103.

PMID: 27899160 PMC: 5129198. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-016-0316-x.


Pharmacological modulation of ureteric peristalsis in a chronically instrumented conscious pig model: effect of adrenergic and nitrergic modulation.

Roshani H, Weltings S, Dabhoiwala N, Lamers W World J Urol. 2015; 34(5):747-54.

PMID: 26276150 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1663-8.


A novel videomicroscopic technique for studying rat ureteral peristalsis in vivo.

Osman F, Nadasy G, Monos E, Nyirady P, Romics I World J Urol. 2008; 27(2):265-70.

PMID: 19020887 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0340-6.