» Articles » PMID: 11821986

The Ex Vivo Wettability of Soft Contact Lenses

Overview
Journal Curr Eye Res
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2002 Feb 1
PMID 11821986
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the ex vivo wettability of Etafilcon A contact lenses over an eight hour period of wear and observe the influence of surfactant pre-treatment.

Methods: Etafilcon A hydrogel lenses, comprising poly[2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid] and 58% water, were soaked for 12 hours in either 0.9% saline (control) or a 1% aqueous solution of poloxamine 1107 (treated). The advancing and receding contact angles were subsequently determined ex vivo after various periods of wear in six adapted contact lens wearers using a single-blind, randomised protocol. Contact angles were measured with a dynamic contact angle tensiometer, using the Wilhelmy plate technique. Patient comfort scores were recorded and the static surface tensions of the probe fluids assessed.

Results: Control lenses exhibited no change in wetting angles over time, indicating a lack of surface modification by components within the tear film. Treated lenses exhibited a significantly reduced advancing angle (p < 0.001) and hysteresis angle (p < 0.001) when compared with control lenses. In addition, treated lenses were consistently rated as being more comfortable than control lenses (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This study has shown clearly that new Etafilcon A lenses do not exhibit significant changes in wettability during the initial four hour wearing period. Pre-treatment of such lenses with a polymeric surfactant results in wetting of the lenses due to the adsorption of surfactant. The surfactant is retained by the lens for at least eight hours of wear, resulting in significant improvements in subjective comfort, especially over the first 30 minutes of wear.

Citing Articles

Scleral Lenses for Managing Dry Eye Disease in the Absence of Corneal Irregularities: What Is the Current Evidence?.

Qiu S, Fadel D, Hui A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999403 PMC: 11242693. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133838.


In-vitro dehydration kinetics coefficient of Kalifilcon A and other contact lens materials.

Ponzini E, Maspero F, Galli A, Tavazzi S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7870.

PMID: 38570546 PMC: 10991492. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55937-2.


Biocidal Efficacies of Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions Against International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Compendial Organisms.

Corwin-Buell J, Callahan D, McGrath D, Millard K, Mosehauer G, Phatak N Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:337-345.

PMID: 38332902 PMC: 10849899. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S445870.


Comparative Analysis of the Osmoprotective Effects of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Packaging Solutions on Human Corneal Epithelial Cells.

VanDerMeid K, Byrnes M, Millard K, Scheuer C, Phatak N, Reindel W Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:247-258.

PMID: 38292853 PMC: 10825585. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S437841.


Effect of Contact Lens Solutions in Stabilizing the Activity of Tear Lysozyme.

Scheuer C, Barniak V, Phatak N, Rah M, Reindel W Clin Optom (Auckl). 2023; 15:119-127.

PMID: 37205004 PMC: 10187650. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S404261.