» Articles » PMID: 11809802

Identification of Residues in Yeast Spo11p Critical for Meiotic DNA Double-strand Break Formation

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2002 Jan 26
PMID 11809802
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spo11 protein (Spo11p) is thought to generate the DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate homologous recombination during meiosis. Spo11p is related to a subunit of archaebacterial topoisomerase VI and appears to cleave DNA through a topoisomerase-like transesterase mechanism. In this work, we used the crystal structure of a fragment of topoisomerase VI to model the Spo11p structure and to identify amino acid residues in yeast Spo11p potentially involved in DSB catalysis and/or DNA binding. These residues were mutated to determine which are critical for Spo11p function in vivo. Mutation of Glu-233 or Asp-288, which lie in a conserved structural motif called the Toprim domain, abolished meiotic recombination. These Toprim domain residues have been implicated in binding a metal ion cofactor in topoisomerases and bacterial primases, supporting the idea that DNA cleavage by Spo11p is Mg(2+) dependent. Mutations at an invariant arginine (Arg-131) within a second conserved structural motif known as the 5Y-CAP domain, as well as three other mutations (E235A, F260R, and D290A), caused marked changes in the DSB pattern at a recombination hotspot, suggesting that Spo11p contributes directly to the choice of DNA cleavage site. Finally, certain DSB-defective mutant alleles generated in this study conferred a semidominant negative phenotype but only when Spo11p activity was partially compromised by the presence of an epitope tag. These results are consistent with a multimeric structure for Spo11p in vivo but may also indicate that the amount of Spo11 protein is not a limiting factor for DSB formation in normal cells.

Citing Articles

SPO11 dimers are sufficient to catalyse DNA double-strand breaks in vitro.

Oger C, Claeys Bouuaert C Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 39972130 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08574-8.


Reconstitution of SPO11-dependent double-strand break formation.

Zheng Z, Zheng L, Arter M, Liu K, Yamada S, Ontoso D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605552 PMC: 11601517. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.20.624382.


Cryo-EM structures of the Spo11 core complex bound to DNA.

Yu Y, Wang J, Liu K, Zheng Z, Arter M, Claeys Bouuaert C Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024; 32(1):113-124.

PMID: 39304764 PMC: 11746154. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-024-01382-8.


Phylogenetic distribution of DNA topoisomerase VI and its distinction from SPO11.

Allen A, Maxwell A NAR Genom Bioinform. 2024; 6(3):lqae085.

PMID: 39108638 PMC: 11302465. DOI: 10.1093/nargab/lqae085.


The TOPOVIBL meiotic DSB formation protein: new insights from its biochemical and structural characterization.

Diagouraga B, Tambones I, Carivenc C, Bechara C, Nadal M, de Massy B Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(15):8930-8946.

PMID: 38966985 PMC: 11347134. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae587.


References
1.
Nichols M, DeAngelis K, Keck J, Berger J . Structure and function of an archaeal topoisomerase VI subunit with homology to the meiotic recombination factor Spo11. EMBO J. 1999; 18(21):6177-88. PMC: 1171681. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.21.6177. View

2.
Bergerat A, de Massy B, Gadelle D, Varoutas P, Nicolas A, Forterre P . An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature. 1997; 386(6623):414-7. DOI: 10.1038/386414a0. View

3.
Cha R, Weiner B, Keeney S, Dekker J, Kleckner N . Progression of meiotic DNA replication is modulated by interchromosomal interaction proteins, negatively by Spo11p and positively by Rec8p. Genes Dev. 2000; 14(4):493-503. PMC: 316381. View

4.
Keck J, Roche D, Lynch A, Berger J . Structure of the RNA polymerase domain of E. coli primase. Science. 2000; 287(5462):2482-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5462.2482. View

5.
Celerin M, Merino S, Stone J, Menzie A, Zolan M . Multiple roles of Spo11 in meiotic chromosome behavior. EMBO J. 2000; 19(11):2739-50. PMC: 212740. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2739. View