» Articles » PMID: 11809546

A Comparison of Computerised Tomography, Laparoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Preoperative Staging of Oesophago-gastric Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Eur J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2002 Jan 26
PMID 11809546
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Objective: Oesophago-gastric carcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis despite advances in diagnosis and treatment. Accurate preoperative staging of gastro-oesophageal carcinoma is, therefore, essential in order to determine patient selection for potentially curative resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the role of computerised tomography (CT), laparoscopic ultrasound (LapUS) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma.

Methods And Patients: Thirty-six patients with histologically proven carcinoma of the oesophagus or stomach who were considered fit for surgical resection were identified from a prospectively collected database. All patients underwent spiral CT, LapUS and EUS as part of their preoperative staging investigations. RESULTS from the staging modalities were compared retrospectively with final histopathology where available and to intraoperative findings where the tumour was irresectable.

Results: Locally advanced tumours (T3/T4) were accurately identified by CT in 15/16 (94%) and by EUS in 14/16 (88%). LapUS was unable to detect 11 tumours (of which five were T3/T4) because they were above the diaphragm, but in the locally advanced cases where the tumour could be seen the accuracy was 10/12 (83%). EUS was the best modality for assessing early tumours and locoregional nodal involvement with accuracies of 8/13 (62%) and 21/29 (72%), respectively. EUS accuracies rose to 64, 92 and 83% for T1/T2, T3/T4 and N staging with the exclusion of those patients (n=6) in whom strictures prevented full assessment. LapUS had a specificity of 100%, compared to 90% for CT and was more accurate than CT for assessing distant metastases (accuracy of 26/32 (81%) compared to 23/32 (72%) for CT).

Conclusions: Although this study is small it has confirmed that CT, EUS and LapUS act in a complimentary manner to provide the most complete preoperative staging for patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.

Citing Articles

Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound during laparoscopic myomectomy: a narrative review.

Aktoz F, Arslan T, Guzel Y J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024; 25(3):179-183.

PMID: 39219255 PMC: 11576648. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-9-7.


Computed tomography radiomics identification of T1-2 and T3-4 stages of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: two-dimensional or three-dimensional?.

Li Y, Yang L, Gu X, Wang Q, Shi G, Zhang A Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023; 49(1):288-300.

PMID: 37843576 PMC: 10789855. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04070-1.


The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Esophageal Cancer.

Pellat A, Dohan A, Soyer P, Veziant J, Coriat R, Barret M Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(5).

PMID: 35267447 PMC: 8909473. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051141.


Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Centred Systems in the Diagnosis and Postoperative Surveillance of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies Using Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Chidambaram S, Sounderajah V, Maynard N, Markar S Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 29(3):1977-1990.

PMID: 34762214 PMC: 8810479. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10882-6.


Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

Ao S, Wang Y, Song Q, Ye Y, Lyu G Chin J Cancer Res. 2021; 33(2):181-192.

PMID: 34158738 PMC: 8181872. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.02.06.