» Articles » PMID: 11796273

Post-ESWL, Clinically Insignificant Residual Stones: Reality or Myth?

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2002 Feb 13
PMID 11796273
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the significance of asymptomatic residual stone fragments of less than 4 mm (clinically insignificant residual fragments [CIRFs]) after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Methods: Eighty-one patients were followed up for 6 to 60 months (mean 15) after ESWL to determine the fate of the CIRFs.

Results: Of the 81 patients, 6 were lost to follow-up, leaving 75 patients. During follow-up, fragments passed spontaneously in 18 patients, remained stable in 13 patients, and became clinically significant in 44 patients who developed one or more complications. For the latter patients, repeated ESWL was done in 16, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 3, and ureteroscopic stone removal in 4 patients. The remaining 21 patients were treated conservatively with analgesics. We found that 53% of the CIRFs located in the pelvis passed spontaneously, and most of the CIRFs in caliceal location became clinically significant. Also, as the stone burden and number of stone fragments increased, the risk of CIRFs becoming clinically significant increased. The outcome was the same whether a metabolic abnormality was present or not, provided the patient received appropriate treatment. The clearance rate was highest in the first 6 months. Finally, as the duration of follow-up increased, the rate of complications increased.

Conclusions: Patients with residual stones after ESWL require close follow-up and timely adjuvant therapy. As the number and size of residual fragments increased, the risk of complications increased. A pelvic location was a favorable factor for spontaneous passage. Metabolic defects, if treated adequately, did not increase the regrowth rate. Although the complete clearance rate of CIRFs with repeated ESWL was lower than for the operative interventions, most patients improved with this modality.

Citing Articles

Stone-event-free survival after retrograde intrarenal surgery: is the stone-free-status so relevant for the future outcomes?.

Mesquita S, Mendes G, Marques-Monteiro M, Rocha M, Madanelo M, Fraga A Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; .

PMID: 39731646 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04343-8.


Navigating the triple threat: Management of post-ESWL urinoma, steinstrasse, and obstructive uropathy: A challenging case report.

Ali R, Irfan S, Irfan W, Anwaar A, Irfan M, Munim Khan A Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(12):6642-6647.

PMID: 39403080 PMC: 11472421. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.09.063.


What is the definition of stone dust and how does it compare with clinically insignificant residual fragments? A comprehensive review.

Panthier F, Kwok J, Tzou D, Monga M, Traxer O, Keller E World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):292.

PMID: 38704492 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04993-4.


SLAP Trial: Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Mechanical Percussion Therapy Post ESWL for Renal Calculi.

Patel N, Roe A, Stanton D, Roberts J, Kothari A Adv Urol. 2024; 2024:7870425.

PMID: 38566931 PMC: 10987243. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7870425.


Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.

Lombardo R, Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Davis N, Neisius A, Petrik A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):202.

PMID: 38546854 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04872-y.