» Articles » PMID: 11782286

Effect of Paper Quality on the Response Rate to a Postal Survey: a Randomised Controlled Trial. ISRCTN 32032031

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2002 Jan 10
PMID 11782286
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Response rates to surveys are declining and this threatens the validity and generalisability of their findings. We wanted to determine whether paper quality influences the response rate to postal surveys

Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE). Recipients were randomised to receiving the questionnaire printed on standard quality paper or high quality paper.

Results: The response rate for the recipients of high quality paper was 43/195 (22%) and 57/194 (29%) for standard quality paper (relative rate of response 0.75, 95% CI 0.33-1.05, p = 0.1

Conclusion: The use of high quality paper did not increase response rates to a questionnaire survey of gynaecologists affiliated to an endoscopic society.

Citing Articles

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 11:MR000008.

PMID: 38032037 PMC: 10687884. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.


Factors Affecting Acceptance and Intention to Receive Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 Vaccine among Primary School Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Birmingham, UK.

Janks M, Cooke S, Odedra A, Kang H, Bellman M, Jordan R Influenza Res Treat. 2012; 2012:182565.

PMID: 23150815 PMC: 3485484. DOI: 10.1155/2012/182565.


Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.

Glidewell L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Bonetti D, Johnston M, Eccles M BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12:250.

PMID: 22891875 PMC: 3508866. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-250.


Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.

Martins Y, Lederman R, Lowenstein C, Joffe S, Neville B, Hastings B Br J Cancer. 2012; 106(6):1021-6.

PMID: 22374464 PMC: 3304407. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.28.


Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3):MR000008.

PMID: 19588449 PMC: 8941848. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.


References
1.
McAvoy B, Kaner E . General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?. BMJ. 1996; 313(7059):732-3; discussion 733-4. PMC: 2352115. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.732. View

2.
Spry V, Hovell M, SALLIS J, Hofsteter C, Elder J, Molgaard C . Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 130(1):166-72. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115309. View

3.
Clark T, Daniels J, Khan K, Gupta J . Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a survey of gynecological practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001; 80(1):62-4. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.800112.x. View

4.
Clark T, Khan K, Gupta J . Provision of pen along with questionnaire does not increase the response rate to a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55(8):595-6. PMC: 1731952. DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.8.595. View

5.
Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357(9263):1191-4. View