» Articles » PMID: 11756654

Mice and Humans Perceive Multiharmonic Communication Sounds in the Same Way

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2002 Jan 5
PMID 11756654
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vowels and voiced consonants of human speech and most mammalian vocalizations consist of harmonically structured sounds. The frequency contours of formants in the sounds determine their spectral shape and timbre and carry, in human speech, important phonetic and prosodic information to be communicated. Steady-state partitions of vowels are discriminated and identified mainly on the basis of harmonics or formants having been resolved by the critical-band filters of the auditory system and then grouped together. Speech-analog processing and perception of vowel-like communication sounds in mammalian vocal repertoires has not been demonstrated so far. Here, we synthesize 11 call models and a tape loop with natural wriggling calls of mouse pups and show that house mice perceive this communication call in the same way as we perceive speech vowels: they need the presence of a minimum number of formants (three formants-in this case, at 3.8 + 7.6 + 11.4 kHz), they resolve formants by the critical-band mechanism, group formants together for call identification, perceive the formant structure rather continuously, may detect the missing fundamental of a harmonic complex, and all of these occur in a natural communication situation without any training or behavioral constraints. Thus, wriggling-call perception in mice is comparable with unconditioned vowel discrimination and perception in prelinguistic human infants and points to evolutionary old rules of handling speech sounds in the human auditory system up to the perceptual level.

Citing Articles

Differential Encoding of Two-Tone Harmonics in the Male and Female Mouse Auditory Cortex.

De A, Agarwalla S, Kaushik R, Mandal D, Bandyopadhyay S J Neurosci. 2024; 44(44).

PMID: 39299802 PMC: 11529816. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0364-24.2024.


Bilateral and symmetric glycinergic and glutamatergic projections from the LSO to the IC in the CBA/CaH mouse.

Williams I, Ryugo D Front Neural Circuits. 2024; 18:1430598.

PMID: 39184455 PMC: 11341401. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1430598.


Hippocampal cognitive and relational map paradigms explored by multisensory encoding recording with wide-field calcium imaging.

Sun D, Shaik N, Rajasekharan Unnithan R, French C iScience. 2023; 27(1):108603.

PMID: 38094852 PMC: 10713853. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108603.


The +/+) mouse model of autism spectrum disorder displays auditory avoidance in a novel behavioral test.

Goncalves A, Sousa N, Jacinto L, Monteiro P Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1205507.

PMID: 37693284 PMC: 10483143. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1205507.


The perceptual categorization of multidimensional stimuli is hierarchically organized.

Chen C, de Hoz L iScience. 2023; 26(6):106941.

PMID: 37378341 PMC: 10291468. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106941.


References
1.
Ritsma R . Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1967; 42(1):191-8. DOI: 10.1121/1.1910550. View

2.
Terhardt E . Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974; 55(5):1061-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1914648. View

3.
Pisoni D . Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Percept Psychophys. 2012; 13(2):253-260. PMC: 3515632. DOI: 10.3758/BF03214136. View

4.
Darwin C . Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984; 76(6):1636-47. DOI: 10.1121/1.391610. View

5.
Mittmann D, Wenstrup J . Combination-sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res. 1995; 90(1-2):185-91. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00164-x. View