Changing Methods of Imaging the Common Bile Duct in the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Era in Western Australia: Implications for Surgical Practice

Overview

Journal Ann Surg

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2001 Dec 26

PMID 11753041

Citations 11

Authors

Nigel T Barwood

Liora J Valinsky

Michael S T Hobbs

David R Fletcher

Matthew W Knuiman

Steve C Ridout

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To assess changes in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), and surgical exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) associated with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Summary Background Data: The optimal strategy for dealing with potential stones of the CBD during LC remains controversial.

Methods: The authors conducted a population-based study of all cases of cholecystectomy (20,084) in Western Australia in the periods before, during, and after the introduction of LC (1988-1994). Index admissions were linked to previous or subsequent admissions for ERCP. Factors associated with ERCP were analyzed by multivariate regression models.

Results: Between 1988 and 1994, admissions for ERCP almost doubled, whereas the use of IOC decreased from 71% to 51%. Different trends were found for open and laparoscopic procedures. Exploration of the CBD declined because of the infrequent use of this procedure in LC. Preoperative ERCP was significantly more common in older patients and men; the reverse was found for IOC. There was an adjusted 3.5-fold increase in preoperative ERCP both during and after the introduction of LC. The adjusted odds ratios for IOC were 0.48 and 0.52 for these periods.

Conclusions: The introduction of LC was associated with increasing reliance on ERCP to image the CBD and a decrease in the use of IOC. These changes were observed in both LC and open cholecystectomy. They suggest that the use of ERCP before cholecystectomy has partly replaced IOC for visualization of the CBD for suspected stones. Although more than 40% of patients undergoing LC had IOC, surgeons appear to be reluctant to perform surgical exploration of the CBD when stones are present. Savings in terms of both complications and cost can be expected if preoperative ERCPs performed for suspicion of uncomplicated CBD stones are replaced by IOC.

Citing Articles

Temporal trends in utilization and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis from 1998 to 2012.

Parikh M, Gupta N, Thota P, Lopez R, Sanaka M Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(4):1740-1748.

PMID: 28917018 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5856-7.

Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Costi R, Gnocchi A, Di Mario F, Sarli L World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(37):13382-401.

PMID: 25309071 PMC: 4188892. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13382.

An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

Mattila A, Luhtala J, Mrena J, Kautiainen H, Kellokumpu I Surg Endosc. 2014; 28(12):3451-7.

PMID: 24939161 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3620-9.

[Laparoscopic versus endoscopic primary management of choledocholithiasis. A retrospective case-control study].

Sgourakis G, Lanitis S, Karaliotas C, Gockel I, Kaths M, Karaliotas C Chirurg. 2012; 83(10):897-903.

PMID: 22476872 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-012-2279-9.

Role of ERCP in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis in sickle cell anemia.

Issa H, Al-Salem A World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(14):1844-7.

PMID: 21528058 PMC: 3080719. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i14.1844.

References

Escarce J, Chen W, Schwartz J . Falling cholecystectomy thresholds since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1995; 273(20):1581-5. View

Traverso L, Roush T, Koo K . CBD stones--outcomes and costs. Laparoscopic transcystic techniques other than choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(11):1242-4. View

Soper N, Dunnegan D . Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 1992; 16(6):1133-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF02067079. View

Heuberger A, Miller K, Hutter J, Moritz E . An unusual complication of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 1999; 31(3):S19-20. View

Robinson G, Hollinshead J, Falk G, Moulton J . Technique and results of laparoscopic choledochotomy for the management of bile duct calculi. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995; 65(5):347-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb00653.x. View

Hardy K, Miller H, McNeil J, Shulkes A . Measurement of surgical costs: a clinical analysis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994; 64(9):607-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02301.x. View

Fletcher D, Hobbs M, Tan P, Valinsky L, Hockey R, Pikora T . Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 1999; 229(4):449-57. PMC: 1191728. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199904000-00001. View

Carroll B, Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest W, Gershman A, Fallas M . Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992; 2(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1089/lps.1992.2.15. View

Dorazio R . Selective operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1995; 61(10):911-3. View

10.

Traverso L, Hargrave K . A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1995; 169(5):503-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80205-0. View

11.

Ng T, Amaral J . Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999; 9(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.31. View

12.

Al-Mulhim A, Al-Ali A, Albar A, Bahnassy A, Abdelhadi M, Wosornu L . Increased rate of cholecystectomy after introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Saudi Arabia. World J Surg. 1999; 23(5):458-62. DOI: 10.1007/pl00012330. View

13.

Fletcher D . Changes in the practice of biliary surgery and ERCP during the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Australia: their possible significance. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994; 64(2):75-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02147.x. View

14.

Kozarek . ERCP interaction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(4):363-4. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900675. View

15.

Carroll B, Phillips E, Rosenthal R, Liberman M, Fallas M . Update on transcystic exploration of the bile duct. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996; 6(6):453-8. View

16.

Fletcher D . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what national benefits have been achieved and at what cost?. Med J Aust. 1995; 163(10):535-8. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb122142.x. View

17.

Velanovich V, Kaufmann C . Two pitfalls of laparoscopic balloon cholangiography: recognition and correction. Am Surg. 1993; 59(5):290-2. View

18.

Ure B, Lefering R, Troidl H . Costs of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(4):401-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00187159. View

19.

Legorreta A, Silber J, Costantino G, Kobylinski R, Zatz S . Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993; 270(12):1429-32. View

20.

Sackier J, Berci G, Phillips E, Carroll B, Shapiro S, Paz-Partlow M . The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1991; 126(8):1021-5; discussion 1025-6. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410320111016. View