Parasites and Supernormal Manipulation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Social parasites may exploit their hosts by mimicking other organisms that the hosts normally benefit from investing in or responding to in some other way. Some parasites exaggerate key characters of the organisms they mimic, possibly in order to increase the response from the hosts. The huge gape and extreme begging intensity of the parasitic common cuckoo chick (Cuculus canorus) may be an example. In this paper, the evolutionary stability of manipulating hosts through exaggerated signals is analysed using game theory. Our model indicates that a parasite's signal intensity must be below a certain threshold in order to ensure acceptance and that this threshold depends directly on the rate of parasitism. The only evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) combination is when hosts accept all signallers and parasites signal at their optimal signal intensity, which must be below the threshold. Supernormal manipulation by parasites is only evolutionarily stable under sufficiently low rates of parasitism. If the conditions for the ESS combination are not satisfied, rejector hosts can invade using signal intensity as a cue for identifying parasites. These qualitative predictions are discussed with respect to empirical evidence from parasitic mimicry systems that have been suggested to involve supernormal signalling, including evicting avian brood parasites and insect-mimicking Ophrys orchids.
Rearing a virulent common cuckoo is not extra costly for its only cavity-nesting host.
Samas P, Rutila J, Honza M, Kysucan M, Grim T Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1889).
PMID: 30355712 PMC: 6234889. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1710.
Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host.
Grim T Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1608):373-81.
PMID: 17164201 PMC: 1702381. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3731.
Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270 Suppl 1:S73-5.
PMID: 12952641 PMC: 1698041. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0017.
How an orchid harms its pollinator.
Wong B, Schiestl F Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1500):1529-32.
PMID: 12184821 PMC: 1691071. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2052.