Marginal and Dynamic Regression Models for Longitudinal Data
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Regression models for longitudinal data often employ random effects and serial correlation to account for residual variation between and within subjects. Most of these models are marginal models, separating the mean and covariance parameters. This paper discusses the use of dynamic models in which a lagged response serves as a predictor and compares these to marginal models. Regression parameters have a different interpretation in dynamic models as they describe changes in response levels, rather than the levels themselves. Lagged predictors are also useful with longitudinal data, explicitly quantifying the effect of previous levels of risk factors. These models are explored through analysis of data from the Childhood Respiratory Study, modelling lung function (FEV(1)) levels as a function of age, height, sex and smoking status in children measured over a five-year period.
McDonald S, Vieira R, Johnston D Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021; 8(1):32-54.
PMID: 34040861 PMC: 8114402. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1711096.
McDonald S, Vieira R, Godfrey A, OBrien N, White M, Sniehotta F Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):167.
PMID: 29221449 PMC: 5723062. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0623-7.
A network approach to psychopathology: new insights into clinical longitudinal data.
Bringmann L, Vissers N, Wichers M, Geschwind N, Kuppens P, Peeters F PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e60188.
PMID: 23593171 PMC: 3617177. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060188.
Xu X, Wang H, Vermeulen A J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011; 38(3):353-67.
PMID: 21451962 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-011-9197-1.