Twenty-one-gauge Needles Provide More Cellular Samples Than Twenty-five-gauge Needles in Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Thyroid but May Not Provide Increased Diagnostic Accuracy
Overview
Affiliations
The technique of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the thyroid is important to evaluate malignancy in thyroid nodules. Eighty-five percent of thyroid FNA procedures lead to sufficient cellular material for diagnosis. With more cells aspirated, the chance of sufficiency for diagnosis increases. Large-bore needles lead to more cellular material being aspirated but bloodier specimens that may interfere with cytologic interpretation. Small-bore needles may result in too few cells for diagnosis. We conducted a randomized prospective study contrasting 21-gauge and 25-gauge needles in the evaluation of 50 consecutively enrolled nodules at our institution. In our investigation, 21-gauge needles more frequently provided superior biopsy specimens (50%) than did 25-gauge needles (18%). In the remaining specimens (32%), the 21-gauge and 25-gauge needles provided similar cellular material. The rate of sufficient samples was the same. We conclude that use of 21-gauge needles results in more cellular specimens but may not result in increased diagnostic accuracy.
Park J, Choi W, Hong A, Yoon J, Kim H, Kang H Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023; 38(1):104-116.
PMID: 36891657 PMC: 10008658. DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2023.1669.
Asakly M, Farhat R, El Khatib N, Khater A, Safia A, Karam M J Thyroid Res. 2022; 2022:8212636.
PMID: 36071949 PMC: 9444405. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8212636.
A Rare Complication of Fine-Needle Aspiration of Neck Structures.
Qadadha Y, Nanda N, Ennis C, McCulloch T Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2021; 2021:8944119.
PMID: 34956684 PMC: 8695029. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8944119.
Dong Y, Gao L, Sui Y, Mao M, Zhan W, Zhou J Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2021; 2021:5544921.
PMID: 34211823 PMC: 8205598. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5544921.
Effect of needle gauge on thyroid FNA diagnostic rate.
Saraph S, Cohen H, Ronen O Endocrine. 2021; 74(3):625-631.
PMID: 34146249 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02797-9.