» Articles » PMID: 11700341

Individual-based Modelling of Biofilms

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2001 Nov 9
PMID 11700341
Citations 101
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the emergence of the complex organization of biofilms from the interactions of its parts, individual cells and their environment, is the aim of the individual-based modelling (IbM) approach. This IbM is version 2 of BacSim, a model of Escherichia coli colony growth, which was developed into a two-dimensional multi-substrate, multi-species model of nitrifying biofilms. It was compared with the established biomass-based model (BbM) of Picioreanu and others. Both models assume that biofilm growth is due to the processes of diffusion, reaction and growth (including biomass growth, division and spreading). In the IbM, each bacterium was a spherical cell in continuous space and had variable growth parameters. Spreading of biomass occurred by shoving of cells to minimize overlap between cells. In the BbM, biomass was distributed in a discrete grid and each species had uniform growth parameters. Spreading of biomass occurred by cellular automata rules. In the IbM, the effect of random variation of growth parameters of individual bacteria was negligible in contrast to the E. coli colony model, because the heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm was more important. The growth of a single cell into a clone, and therefore also the growth of the less abundant species, depended on the randomly chosen site of attachment, owing to the heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm. The IbM agreed with the BbM regarding the overall growth of the biofilm, due to the same diffusion-reaction processes. However, the biofilm shape was different due to the different biomass spreading mechanisms. The IbM biofilm was more confluent and rounded due to the steady, deterministic and directionally unconstrained spreading of the bacteria. Since the biofilm shape is influenced by the spreading mechanism, it is partially independent of growth, which is driven by diffusion-reaction. Chance in initial attachment events modifies the biofilm shape and the growth of single cells because of the high heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm, which again results from the interaction of diffusion-reaction with spreading. This stresses the primary importance of spreading and chance in addition to diffusion-reaction in the emergence of the complexity of the biofilm community.

Citing Articles

Disentangling the feedback loops driving spatial patterning in microbial communities.

Henderson A, Del Panta A, Schubert O, Mitri S, van Vliet S NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025; 11(1):32.

PMID: 39979272 PMC: 11842706. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00666-1.


Advancing dental biofilm models: the integral role of pH in predicting colonization.

Sangha J, Gogulancea V, Curtis T, Jakubovics N, Barrett P, Metris A mSphere. 2024; 10(1):e0074324.

PMID: 39660862 PMC: 11774048. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00743-24.


Optogenetic patterning generates multi-strain biofilms with spatially distributed antibiotic resistance.

Jin X, Riedel-Kruse I Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9443.

PMID: 39487123 PMC: 11530673. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53546-1.


Bacterial community dynamics as a result of growth-yield trade-off and multispecies metabolic interactions toward understanding the gut biofilm niche.

Valiei A, Dickson A, Aminian-Dehkordi J, Mofrad M BMC Microbiol. 2024; 24(1):441.

PMID: 39472801 PMC: 11523853. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03566-0.


Metabolic interactions shape emergent biofilm structures in a conceptual model of gut mucosal bacterial communities.

Valiei A, Dickson A, Aminian-Dehkordi J, Mofrad M NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024; 10(1):99.

PMID: 39358363 PMC: 11447261. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00572-y.