» Articles » PMID: 11691858

Automated Construction of High-density Comparative Maps Between Rat, Human, and Mouse

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2001 Nov 3
PMID 11691858
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal models have been used primarily as surrogates for humans, having similar disease-based phenotypes. Genomic organization also tends to be conserved between species, leading to the generation of comparative genome maps. The emergence of radiation hybrid (RH) maps, coupled with the large numbers of available Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs), has revolutionized the way comparative maps can be built. We used publicly available rat, mouse, and human data to identify genes and ESTs with interspecies sequence identity (homology), identified their UniGene relationships, and incorporated their RH map positions to build integrated comparative maps with >2100 homologous UniGenes mapped in more than one species (approximately 6% of all mammalian genes). The generation of these maps is iterative and labor intensive; therefore, we developed a series of computer tools (not described here) based on our algorithm that identifies anchors between species and produces printable and on-line clickable comparative maps that link to a wide variety of useful tools and databases. The maps were constructed using sequence-based comparisons, thus creating "hooks" for further sequence-based annotation of human, mouse, and rat sequences. Currently, this map enables investigators to link the physiology of the rat with the genetics of the mouse and the clinical significance of the human.

Citing Articles

2022 updates to the Rat Genome Database: a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) resource.

Vedi M, Smith J, Hayman G, Tutaj M, Brodie K, De Pons J Genetics. 2023; 224(1).

PMID: 36930729 PMC: 10474928. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad042.


The Rat Genome Database (RGD) facilitates genomic and phenotypic data integration across multiple species for biomedical research.

Kaldunski M, Smith J, Hayman G, Brodie K, De Pons J, Demos W Mamm Genome. 2021; 33(1):66-80.

PMID: 34741192 PMC: 8570235. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-021-09932-x.


Animal Models of Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Lerman L, Kurtz T, Touyz R, Ellison D, Chade A, Crowley S Hypertension. 2019; 73(6):e87-e120.

PMID: 30866654 PMC: 6740245. DOI: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000090.


Genetic, physiological and comparative genomic studies of hypertension and insulin resistance in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Coan P, Hummel O, Diaz A, Barrier M, Alfazema N, Norsworthy P Dis Model Mech. 2017; 10(3):297-306.

PMID: 28130354 PMC: 5374317. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.026716.


Fast and accurate construction of ultra-dense consensus genetic maps using evolution strategy optimization.

Mester D, Ronin Y, Schnable P, Aluru S, Korol A PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0122485.

PMID: 25867943 PMC: 4395089. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122485.


References
1.
Nadeau J . Maps of linkage and synteny homologies between mouse and man. Trends Genet. 1989; 5(3):82-6. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90031-0. View

2.
Nash W, OBrien S . Conserved regions of homologous G-banded chromosomes between orders in mammalian evolution: carnivores and primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(21):6631-5. PMC: 347182. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6631. View

3.
Stoll M, Cowley Jr A, Harris E, Harrap S, Krieger J, Printz M . New target regions for human hypertension via comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2000; 10(4):473-82. PMC: 310887. DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.4.473. View

4.
CASTLE W, Wachter W . Variations of Linkage in Rats and Mice. Genetics. 1924; 9(1):1-12. PMC: 1200768. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/9.1.1. View

5.
Pennisi E . Genomics. Rat genome off to an early start. Science. 2000; 289(5483):1267-9. View