» Articles » PMID: 11679341

Quantification of Soil-to-plant Transport of Recombinant Nucleopolyhedrovirus: Effects of Soil Type and Moisture, Air Currents, and Precipitation

Overview
Date 2001 Oct 27
PMID 11679341
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significantly more occlusion bodies (OB) of DuPont viral construct HzSNPV-LqhIT2, expressing a scorpion toxin, were transported by artificial rainfall to cotton plants from sandy soil (70:15:15 sand-silt-clay) than from silt (15:70:15) and significantly more from silt than from clay (15:15:70). The amounts transported by 5 versus 50 mm of precipitation were the same, and transport was zero when there was no precipitation. In treatments that included precipitation, the mean number of viable OB transported to entire, 25- to 35-cm-tall cotton plants ranged from 56 (clay soil, 5 mm of rain) to 226 (sandy soil, 50 mm of rain) OB/plant. In a second experiment, viral transport increased with increasing wind velocity (0, 16, and 31 km/h) and was greater in dry (-1.0 bar of matric potential) than in moist (-0.5 bar) soil. Wind transport was greater for virus in a clay soil than in silt or sand. Only 3.3 x 10(-7) (clay soil, 5 mm rain) to 1.3 x 10(-6) (sandy soil, 50 mm rain) of the OB in surrounding soil in experiment 1 or 1.1 x 10(-7) (-0.5 bar sandy soil, 16-km/h wind) to 1.3 x 10(-6) (-1.0 bar clay soil, 31-km/h wind) in experiment 2 were transported by rainfall or wind to cotton plants. This reduces the risk of environmental release of a recombinant nucleopolyhedrovirus (NPV), because only a very small proportion of recombinant virus in the soil reservoir is transported to vegetation, where it can be ingested by and replicate in new host insects.

Citing Articles

Presence of Spodoptera frugiperda Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus (SfMNPV) Occlusion Bodies in Maize Field Soils of Mesoamerica.

Williams T, Melo-Molina G, Jimenez-Fernandez J, Weissenberger H, Gomez-Diaz J, Navarro-de-la-Fuente L Insects. 2023; 14(1).

PMID: 36662012 PMC: 9864064. DOI: 10.3390/insects14010080.


The distribution of covert microbial natural enemies of a globally invasive crop pest, fall armyworm, in Africa: Enemy release and spillover events.

Withers A, Rice A, de Boer J, Donkersley P, Pearson A, Chipabika G J Anim Ecol. 2022; 91(9):1826-1841.

PMID: 35678697 PMC: 9544759. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13760.


Co-infection with iflaviruses influences the insecticidal properties of Spodoptera exigua multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus occlusion bodies: Implications for the production and biosecurity of baculovirus insecticides.

Carballo A, Murillo R, Jakubowska A, Herrero S, Williams T, Caballero P PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177301.

PMID: 28475633 PMC: 5419652. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177301.


Plant-mediated effects on an insect-pathogen interaction vary with intraspecific genetic variation in plant defences.

Shikano I, Shumaker K, Peiffer M, Felton G, Hoover K Oecologia. 2017; 183(4):1121-1134.

PMID: 28144733 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3826-3.


Behavioural manipulation of insect hosts by Baculoviridae as a process of niche construction.

Hamblin S, Tanaka M BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:170.

PMID: 23953199 PMC: 3751707. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-170.


References
1.
Bonning B, Hammock B . Development of recombinant baculoviruses for insect control. Annu Rev Entomol. 1996; 41:191-210. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.001203. View

2.
Small D, Moore N, Entwistle P . Hydrophobic interactions involved in attachment of a baculovirus to hydrophobic surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986; 52(1):220-3. PMC: 203463. DOI: 10.1128/aem.52.1.220-223.1986. View

3.
Lee , Fuxa . Transport of Wild-Type and Recombinant Nucleopolyhedroviruses by Scavenging and Predatory Arthropods. Microb Ecol. 2000; 39(4):301-313. View

4.
Moscardi F . Assessment of the application of baculoviruses for control of Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 2004; 44:257-89. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.257. View

5.
STEINHAUS E, Thompson C . Preliminary field tests using a polyhedrosis virus to control the alfalfa caterpillar. J Econ Entomol. 1949; 42(2):301-5. DOI: 10.1093/jee/42.2.301. View