» Articles » PMID: 11641288

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Pulse Pressure in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I)

Overview
Journal Hypertension
Date 2001 Oct 20
PMID 11641288
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increased stiffness of the conduit arteries has been associated with increased risk of death and cardiovascular death in a number of populations. None of these populations, however, are fully representative of the US population. The cohort examined in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) that was free of overt cardiovascular disease was selected to be representative of the US population. We assessed and quantified the increased risk of death associated with elevated pulse pressure in this population. A cohort of 5771 subjects from NHANES I was used to determine the value of adding pulse pressure to standard cardiovascular disease risk factors for assessment of the risk of death during a mean follow-up period of 16.5 years. Analyses were performed by use of the SUDAAN statistical package for performing Cox proportional regression, logistic regression, and other standard methods in complex, weighted samples. Pulse pressure increased with increasing age, body mass index, cholesterol level, and mean arterial pressure. With increasing pulse pressure, the percentage of cigarette smokers decreased and the percentage of diabetics increased. Despite these associations with known risk factors, pulse pressure was independently predictive of an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality. It provides independent prognostic information beyond that provided by known risk factors that were evaluated in this study, including the Sixth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure hypertension classification. A 10 mm Hg increase in pulse pressure in persons 25 to 45 of age was associated with a 26% increase in risk of cardiovascular death (95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 50) and with an 10% increase (95% CI, 2 to 19) in persons 46 to 77 years of age. In a cohort designed to be representative of the US population, elevated pulse pressure has been shown to provide independent prognostic information. This variable may be a marker for the extent of vascular disease and may contribute to the occurrence of clinical events.

Citing Articles

Hypertensive Diabetic Patients: Casual Pulse Pressure and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) as Superior Predictors of Future Cardiovascular Events.

Pinheiro I, Pacheco A, Carvalho S, Aguiar T, Bastos J Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77974.

PMID: 39996205 PMC: 11849757. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77974.


Relationships between ankle blood pressure indices and major adverse cardiovascular events in people with and without type 2 diabetes.

Mohammedi K, Pigeyre M, Bosch J, Yusuf S, Gerstein H Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):325.

PMID: 39227845 PMC: 11373129. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02383-z.


Arterial Stiffness and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Kim H, Jo S J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(23):e195.

PMID: 38887204 PMC: 11182699. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e195.


Relationship between Pulse Pressure and Handgrip Strength in the Korean Population: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.

Kwon R, Cho Y, Park E, Lee Y, Lee S, Choi J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592346 PMC: 10935154. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051515.


Pulse pressure and inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: investigating mortality, hospital major cardiovascular events, and long-term prognosis.

Hashemi-Jokandan E, Khalaji A, Abdollahzadeh A, Separham A J Public Health Afr. 2024; 14(12):2743.

PMID: 38204807 PMC: 10774853. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2743.