The Osteopathic Distinction: Fact or Fancy?

Overview

Journal J Med Humanit

Publisher Springer

Specialty Medical Ethics

Date 1993 Jan 1

PMID 11639480

Authors

J F Peppin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Since osteopathic medicine's inception its distinction has been proclaimed steadfastly in the osteopathic literature. The uniqueness has been claimed to reside in: (1) rigid adherence to A.T. Still's tenets; (2) osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT); (3) claims of "holism"; (4) "osteopathic principles", (5) esoteric definitions; and (6) other suggested differences. None of these claims can be successfully defended. An aspect of the osteopathic distinction may lie in the didactic of OMT per se. Certain experiences in medical school contribute to the "reconstruction" of the student's view of the patient. Touch, through OMT, may be a quality that affects this change and helps make the osteopathic physician different. When blended with traditional medical modalities this may result in a unique medical perspective. The ideal approach for the osteopathic profession would be an honest evaluation of its function in society and its uniqueness in medicine. The profession may discover a uniqueness with touch as an integral part.

References

Kuchera W . Our osteopathic uniqueness needs nurturing. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1991; 91(2):117, 121. View

Durr C . Hands that help--but how?. Nurs Forum. 1971; 10(4):392-400. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.1971.tb00043.x. View

Older J . Teaching touch at medical school. JAMA. 1984; 252(7):931-3. View

Krauss K . The effects of deep pressure touch on anxiety. Am J Occup Ther. 1987; 41(6):366-73. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.41.6.366. View

FREYMANN J . The odyssey and outlook of graduate medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1989; 89(6):761-4, 767. View

Shlapentokh V, ODonnell N, Grey M . Osteopathic interns' attitudes toward their education and training. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1991; 91(8):786-96, 801-2. View

FRANK L . Tactile communication. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1957; 56(2):209-55. View

Allen T . Guide to clinical preventive services. Report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1991; 91(3):281-9. View

Raftis K, Warfield C . Spinal manipulation for back pain. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1989; 24(3):89-90, 95-6, 102 passim. DOI: 10.1080/21548331.1989.11703679. View

10.

Cummings M . Challenge to osteopathic education. Returning to its primary care roots. JAMA. 1992; 268(9):1139-40. View

11.

MOWBRAY R . Research in choice of medical specialty: a review of the literature 1977-87. Aust N Z J Med. 1989; 19(4):389-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1989.tb00286.x. View

12.

KORR I . Osteopathic medicine: the profession's role in society. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1990; 90(9):824-32, 837. View

13.

Rezler A, Kalishman S . Who goes into family medicine?. J Fam Pract. 1989; 29(6):652-6. View

14.

Good M, Good B . Disabling practitioners: hazards of learning to be a doctor in American medical education. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1989; 59(2):303-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1989.tb01663.x. View

15.

KORR I . The function of the osteopathic profession: a matter for decision. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1959; 59:77-90. View

16.

FEIN R . Sounding boards. What is wrong with the language of medicine?. N Engl J Med. 1982; 306(14):863-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198204083061409. View

17.

BOVARD E . The effects of early handling on viability of the albino rat. Psychol Rev. 1958; 65(5):257-71. DOI: 10.1037/h0046608. View

18.

Duttera Jr M . The healer's hand. JAMA. 1979; 242(1):41. View

19.

Bland J, Boushey D . Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 20(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90090-3. View

20.

Allen T . Practicing what we teach: integrating osteopathic principles into practice. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1990; 90(10):893-4. View