Quantification of Blood Flow in the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound and Three Different Phase-contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences
Overview
Affiliations
Rationale And Objectives: To compare blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries measured with three different magnetic resonance (MR) phase-contrast imaging techniques and with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound.
Methods: Fourteen healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 33 +/- 3.8 years were studied. Ultrasound and MR phase velocity mapping of both common carotid arteries (n = 28) was performed within 5 hours. A two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence with retrospective cardiac gating, a sequence with prospective cardiac triggering, and a breath-hold sequence with prospective cardiac triggering were used. Resistance indexes and pulsatility indexes were calculated for all modalities.
Results: The comparison of flow velocities obtained with ultrasound and the different MR techniques led to a moderate correlation of the retrospective gated and prospective triggered MR techniques (eg, r = 0.73 for maximum systolic velocity). The worst correlation was found between the breath-hold technique and retrospective cardiac gating (eg, r = 0.004 for pulsatility index). There was a weak correlation of all three MR sequences compared with ultrasound (r = 0.19-0.60)
Conclusions: A moderate correlation was found between velocities and indexes measured with the prospective cardiac-triggered phase-contrast MR technique and the retrospective cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR technique. A weak correlation was found between the three different MR techniques and ultrasound, as well as between the breath-hold prospective cardiac-triggered MR sequence and both of the other MR sequences. The influence of temporal and spatial resolution on MR phase-contrast velocity mapping was confirmed.
Knapp J, Tavares de Sousa M, Lenz A, Herrmann J, Zhang S, Kording F Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(3):1698-1706.
PMID: 36271920 PMC: 9935734. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09167-7.
Ficial B, Corsini I, Bonafiglia E, Petoello E, Flore A, Nogara S Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(9).
PMID: 36140485 PMC: 9498289. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092083.
Ha S, Kang Y, Lee H, Hwang M, Baik J, Park S Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(1).
PMID: 35054190 PMC: 8774649. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010023.
Schoennagel B, Yamamura J, Kording F, Fischer R, Bannas P, Adam G Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(8):4169-4176.
PMID: 30617486 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5940-y.
McGah P, Nerva J, Morton R, Barbour M, Levitt M, Mourad P Physiol Meas. 2015; 36(11):2301-17.
PMID: 26450643 PMC: 4684705. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/11/2301.