» Articles » PMID: 11606524

Direct Estimate of the Mutation Rate and the Distribution of Fitness Effects in the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2001 Oct 19
PMID 11606524
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Estimates of the rate and frequency distribution of deleterious effects were obtained for the first time by direct scoring and characterization of individual mutations. This was achieved by applying tetrad analysis to a large number of yeast clones. The genomic rate of spontaneous mutation deleterious to a basic fitness-related trait, that of growth rate, was U = 1.1 x 10(-3) per diploid cell division. Extrapolated to the fruit fly and humans, the per generation rate would be 0.074 and 0.92, respectively. This is likely to be an underestimate because single mutations with selection coefficients s < 0.01 could not be detected. The distribution of s > or = 0.01 was studied both for spontaneous and induced mutations. The latter were induced by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or resulted from defective mismatch repair. Lethal changes accounted for approximately 30-40% of the scored mutations. The mean s of nonlethal mutations was fairly high, but most frequently its value was between 0.01 and 0.05. Although the rate and distribution of very small effects could not be determined, the joint share of such mutations in decreasing average fitness was probably no larger than approximately 1%.

Citing Articles

Hill-Robertson interference may bias the inference of fitness effects of new mutations in highly selfing species.

Daigle A, Johri P Evolution. 2024; 79(3):342-363.

PMID: 39565285 PMC: 11879154. DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpae168.


The distribution of beneficial mutational effects between two sister yeast species poorly explains natural outcomes of vineyard adaptation.

Longan E, Fay J Genetics. 2024; .

PMID: 39373582 PMC: 11631397. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae160.


Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects.

Plavskin Y, Stella de Biase M, Ziv N, Janska L, Zhu Y, Hall D PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(7):e3002698.

PMID: 38950062 PMC: 11244821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002698.


The distribution of beneficial mutational effects between two sister yeast species poorly explains natural outcomes of vineyard adaptation.

Longan E, Fay J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895255 PMC: 11185594. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.03.597243.


Relationships between genomic dissipation and de novo SNP evolution.

Plyler Z, McAtee C, Hill A, Crowley M, Tindall J, Tindall S PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303257.

PMID: 38753830 PMC: 11098520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303257.


References
1.
Keightley P . The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994; 138(4):1315-22. PMC: 1206267. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/138.4.1315. View

2.
Keightley P, Eyre-Walker A . Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics. 1999; 153(2):515-23. PMC: 1460780. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.515. View

3.
Baganz F, Hayes A, Marren D, Gardner D, Oliver S . Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1998; 13(16):1563-73. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199712)13:16<1563::AID-YEA240>3.0.CO;2-6. View

4.
Vassilieva L, Hook A, Lynch M . The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution. 2000; 54(4):1234-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00557.x. View

5.
Reenan R, Kolodner R . Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins. Genetics. 1992; 132(4):963-73. PMC: 1205252. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.963. View