» Articles » PMID: 11556517

Quality of Cold and Warm Gutta-percha Fillings in Oval Canals in Mandibular Premolars

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2001 Sep 15
PMID 11556517
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the quality of cold and warm gutta-percha fillings in oval canals.

Methodology: Two groups of mandibular premolars with oval canals were selected after bucco-lingual and mesio-distal radiographs indicated an internal long: short diameter of > or =1.6 at a level 5 mm from the apex. After instrumentation they were obturated, respectively, by cold lateral compaction of gutta-percha cones (cold GP) and vertical compaction of warm gutta-percha (warm GP). Leakage along apical root fillings was measured using a fluid transport model. After the leakage test, horizontal sections were cut 2 and 4 mm from the apex. The area of the canal and gutta-percha in cross-sections was measured using an image analysis program. The quality of root fillings was evaluated by calculating the percentage of gutta-percha-filled canal area (PGP).

Results: No significant difference in leakage was found between the two groups (P = 0.570). The warm GP group produced significantly higher PGPs than the cold GP group 4 mm from the apex only (P = 0.522 at 2 mm: P = 0.000 at 4 mm).

Conclusions: The percentage of gutta-percha-filled canal area using warm GP was greater than that of the cold GP in oval canals.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of two instrumentation techniques and obturation methods in mandibular first premolar C-shaped canals by Micro-CT.

Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Shi J, Zheng G, Chen Y, Zou D BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):319.

PMID: 40022083 PMC: 11869416. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05696-x.


Evaluating the Restoration of External Root Resorption Under Biomechanical Stress: A Finite Element Analysis.

Celebi S, Sazak Ovecoglu H Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71238.

PMID: 39525115 PMC: 11550405. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71238.


comparative evaluation of apical leakage using a bioceramic sealer with three different obturating techniques: A glucose leakage model.

Agrawal T, Singh S, Podar R, Kulkarni G, Gadkari A, Agarwal N J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(1):76-81.

PMID: 38389733 PMC: 10880467. DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_303_23.


Comparison of Two Root Canal Filling Techniques: Obturation with Guttacore Carrier Based System and Obturation with Guttaflow2 Fluid Gutta-Percha.

Migliau G, Palaia G, Pergolini D, Guglielmelli T, Fascetti R, Sofan A Dent J (Basel). 2022; 10(4).

PMID: 35448065 PMC: 9032128. DOI: 10.3390/dj10040071.


Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal in Apical Third Using Four Different Irrigants With Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis.

Murugesan K, Vishwanath S, Kadandale S, Thanikachalam Y, Parthasarathy R, Ilango S Cureus. 2022; 14(3):e23142.

PMID: 35444899 PMC: 9009992. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23142.