» Articles » PMID: 11551875

Effects of Once-daily Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibition and Calcium Channel Blockade-based Antihypertensive Treatment Regimens on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Diastolic Filling in Hypertension: the Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study...

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2001 Sep 12
PMID 11551875
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether enalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)).

Methods And Results: An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women with essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiography were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study entry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifedipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pressure (-22/12 versus -21/13 mm Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected in population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or severity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase transmitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS).

Conclusions: Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-acting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when needed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistically indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.

Citing Articles

Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Zhu R, Wang W, Gao Y, Liu J, Li B, Shan R J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025; 27(1):e70003.

PMID: 39878390 PMC: 11775913. DOI: 10.1111/jch.70003.


Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.

Hazra P, Mehta A, Desai B, Pandey U, Mehta K, Bajpai S Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2025; 14(6):396-413.

PMID: 39839565 PMC: 11744219. DOI: 10.62347/RPMZ6407.


Calpains as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Myocardial Hypertrophy.

Aluja D, Delgado-Tomas S, Ruiz-Meana M, Barrabes J, Inserte J Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(8).

PMID: 35456920 PMC: 9032729. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084103.


Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Etiology-Based Therapeutic Options.

Yetis Sayin B, Oto A Cardiol Ther. 2022; 11(2):203-230.

PMID: 35353354 PMC: 9135932. DOI: 10.1007/s40119-022-00260-y.


Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Zhu J, Chen N, Zhou M, Guo J, Zhu C, Zhou J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 1:CD003654.

PMID: 35000192 PMC: 8742884. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub6.