» Articles » PMID: 11546699

Sex Matters: Secular and Geographical Trends in Sex Differences in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2001 Sep 8
PMID 11546699
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and investigate how these relate to distributions in risk factors.

Design: National and international data were used to examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and risk factors.

Setting: England and Wales, 1921-98; Australia, France, Japan, Sweden, and the United States, 1947-97; 50 countries, 1992-6.

Data Sources: Office for National Statistics, World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Results: The 20th century epidemic of coronary heart disease affected only men in most industrialised countries and had a very rapid onset in England and Wales, which has been examined in detail. If this male only epidemic had not occurred there would have been 1.2 million fewer deaths from coronary heart disease in men in England and Wales over the past 50 years. Secular trends in mean per capita fat consumption show a similar pattern to secular trends in coronary heart disease mortality in men. Fat consumption is positively correlated with coronary heart disease mortality in men (r(s)=0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86) and inversely associated with coronary heart disease mortality in women (-0.30; -0.49 to -0.08) over this time. Although sex ratios for mortality from coronary heart disease show a clear period effect, those for lung cancer show a cohort effect. Sex ratios for stroke mortality were constant and close to unity for the entire period. Geographical variations in the sex ratio for coronary heart disease were associated with mean per capita fat consumption (0.64; 0.44 to 0.78) but were not associated with the sex ratio for smoking.

Conclusion: Sex differences are largely the result of environmental factors and hence not inevitable. Understanding the factors that determine sex differences has important implications for public health, particularly for countries and parts of countries where the death rates for coronary heart disease are currently increasing.

Citing Articles

Speeding up interval estimation for R2-based mediation effect of high-dimensional mediators via cross-fitting.

Xu Z, Li C, Chi S, Yang T, Wei P Biostatistics. 2024; 26(1).

PMID: 39412139 PMC: 11823199. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxae037.


A sexually dimorphic hepatic cycle of periportal VLDL generation and subsequent pericentral VLDLR-mediated re-uptake.

Martini T, Gobet C, Salati A, Blanc J, Mookhoek A, Reinehr M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8422.

PMID: 39341814 PMC: 11438914. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52751-2.


Sex-Related Differences in Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents with Overweight or Obesity.

Di Bonito P, Di Sessa A, Licenziati M, Corica D, Wasniewska M, Del Giudice E Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(4):141.

PMID: 39076567 PMC: 11264036. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2504141.


Gender differences in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among US adults: from NHANES 2005-2018.

Lv Y, Cao X, Yu K, Pu J, Tang Z, Wei N Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1283132.

PMID: 38420264 PMC: 10899466. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1283132.


Impact of sex difference on clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients with single-vessel and multi-vessel disease: based on Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.

Yim S, Ahn J, Jeong M, Ahn Y, Kim J, Hong Y Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023; 13(4):660-672.

PMID: 37675088 PMC: 10478015. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-536.


References
1.
Posner B, Franz M, Quatromoni P, Gagnon D, Sytkowski P, DAgostino R . Secular trends in diet and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995; 95(2):171-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00043-7. View

2.
Stephen A, Sieber G . Trends in individual fat consumption in the UK 1900-1985. Br J Nutr. 1994; 71(5):775-88. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19940183. View

3.
Feinleib M . Trends in heart disease in the United States. Am J Med Sci. 1995; 310 Suppl 1:S8-14. DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199512000-00003. View

4.
Walden C, Retzlaff B, Buck B, McCann B, Knopp R . Lipoprotein lipid response to the National Cholesterol Education Program step II diet by hypercholesterolemic and combined hyperlipidemic women and men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17(2):375-82. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.17.2.375. View

5.
Hemingway H, Marmot M . Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 1999; 318(7196):1460-7. PMC: 1115843. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1460. View