P300 and LORETA: Comparison of Normal Subjects and Schizophrenic Patients
Overview
Affiliations
It was the aim of the present study 1) to investigate how many cortical activity maxima of scalp-recorded P300 are detected by Low Resolution Electromagentic Tomography (LORETA) when analyses are performed with high time-resolution, 2) to see if the resulting LORETA-solution is in accordance with intracortical recordings as reported by others and 3) to compare the given pattern of cortical activation maxima in the P300-timeframe between schizophrenic patients and normal controls. Current density analysis was performed in 3-D Talairach space with high time resolution i.e. in 6 ms steps. This was done during an auditory choice reaction paradigm separately for normal subjects and schizophrenic patients with subsequent group comparisons. In normal subjects, a sequence of at least seven cortical activation maxima was found between 240-420ms poststimulus: the prefrontal cortex, anterior or medial cingulum, posterior cingulum, parietal cortex, temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex, medial or anterior cingulum. Within the given limits of spatial resolution, this sequential maxima distribution largely met the expectations from reports on intracranial recordings and functional neuroimaging studies. However, localization accuracy was higher near the central midline than at lateral aspects of the brain. Schizophrenic patients less activated their cortex in a widespread area mainly in the left hemisphere including the prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulum and the temporal lobe. From these analyses and comparsions with intracranial recordings as reported by others, it is concluded that LORETA correctly localizes P300-related cortical activity maxima on the basis of 19 electrodes except for lateral cortical aspects which is most likely an edge-phenomenon. The data further suggest that the P300-deficit in schizophrenics involves an extended cortical network of the left hemisphere at several steps in time during the information processing stream.
Zhao R, Ren X, Liu Y, Li Y, Long R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).
PMID: 35886418 PMC: 9323723. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148567.
Pedrazzini E, Ptak R Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):306.
PMID: 30670788 PMC: 6342971. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36537-3.
The Startle-Evoked Potential: Negative Affect and Severity of Pathology in Anxiety/Mood Disorders.
Lang P, Herring D, Duncan C, Richter J, Sege C, Weymar M Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018; 3(7):626-634.
PMID: 30047478 PMC: 6063515. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.07.006.
Molina V, Bachiller A, de Luis R, Lubeiro A, Poza J, Hornero R Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018; 269(4):419-428.
PMID: 29396752 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-018-0877-3.
Babiloni C, Pennica A, Percio C, Noce G, Cordone S, Lopez S Neuroimage Clin. 2016; 12:144-56.
PMID: 27408799 PMC: 4933036. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.06.005.