» Articles » PMID: 11529208

One-time Screening for Colorectal Cancer with Combined Fecal Occult-blood Testing and Examination of the Distal Colon

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2001 Sep 1
PMID 11529208
Citations 124
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Fecal occult-blood testing and sigmoidoscopy have been recommended for screening for colorectal cancer, but the sensitivity of such combined testing for detecting neoplasia is uncertain. At 13 Veterans Affairs medical centers, we performed colonoscopy to determine the prevalence of neoplasia and the sensitivity of one-time screening with a fecal occult-blood test plus sigmoidoscopy.

Methods: Asymptomatic subjects (age range, 50 to 75 years) provided stool specimens on cards from three consecutive days for fecal occult-blood testing, which were rehydrated for interpretation. They then underwent colonoscopy. Sigmoidoscopy was defined in this study as examination of the rectum and sigmoid colon during colonoscopy, and sensitivity was estimated by determining how many patients with advanced neoplasia had an adenoma in the rectum or sigmoid colon. Advanced colonic neoplasia was defined as an adenoma 10 mm or more in diameter, a villous adenoma, an adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, or invasive cancer. Classification of subjects according to the findings was based on the most advanced lesion.

Results: A total of 2885 subjects returned the three specimen cards for fecal occult-blood testing and underwent a complete colonoscopic examination. A total of 23.9 percent of subjects with advanced neoplasia had a positive test for fecal occult blood. As compared with subjects who had a negative test for fecal occult blood, the relative risk of advanced neoplasia in subjects who had a positive test was 3.47 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.76 to 4.35). Sigmoidoscopy identified 70.3 percent of all subjects with advanced neoplasia. Combined one-time screening with a fecal occult-blood test and sigmoidoscopy identified 75.8 percent of subjects with advanced neoplasia.

Conclusions: One-time screening with both a fecal occult-blood test with rehydration and sigmoidoscopy fails to detect advanced colonic neoplasia in 24 percent of subjects with the condition.

Citing Articles

An investigation into cleaning quality of suction-type metal lumen instruments: a cross-sectional study.

Wu Y, Li L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2492.

PMID: 39833252 PMC: 11746972. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83215-8.


A Crisis in Scope: Recruitment and Retention Challenges Reported by VA Gastroenterology Section Chiefs.

von Rosenvinge E, Vela S, Paine E, Chang M, Hanson B, Taddei T Fed Pract. 2024; 41(8):256-260.

PMID: 39410921 PMC: 11473028. DOI: 10.12788/fp.0504.


Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Maida M, Dahiya D, Shah Y, Tiwari A, Gopakumar H, Vohra I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123473 PMC: 11312202. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152746.


Detection of colorectal-cancer-associated bacterial taxa in fecal samples using next-generation sequencing and 19 newly established qPCR assays.

Senthakumaran T, Tannaes T, Moen A, Brackmann S, Jahanlu D, Rounge T Mol Oncol. 2024; 19(2):412-429.

PMID: 38970464 PMC: 11793011. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13700.


Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.

Fouladi A, Asadi A, Sherer E, Madadi M Med Decis Making. 2024; 44(5):554-571.

PMID: 38907706 PMC: 11325561. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241258224.