» Articles » PMID: 11490233

Safety and Morbidity of First and Repeat Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Needle Biopsies: Results of a Prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection Study

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2001 Aug 8
PMID 11490233
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We prospectively evaluate the safety, morbidity and complication rates for first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection Study 1,051 men, with total prostate specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng./ml., underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy plus 2 additional transition zone biopsies. Biopsy samples were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. All 820 patients with biopsy samples negative for prostate cancer underwent re-biopsy after 6 weeks. Immediate and delayed (range 1 to 7 days) morbidity, patient satisfaction and complication rates were recorded.

Results: Of the 1,051 subjects the initial biopsy was positive for prostate cancer in 231 and negative, including benign prostatic hyperplasia or benign tissue, in 820. Of these 820 patients prostate cancer was detected in 10% (83) on re-biopsy. Minor or no discomfort was observed in 92% and 89% of patients at first and re-biopsy, respectively (p = 0.29). Immediate morbidity was minor and included rectal bleeding (2.1% versus 2.4%, p = 0.13), mild hematuria (62% versus 57%, p = 0.06), severe hematuria (0.7% versus 0.5%, p = 0.09) and moderate to severe vasovagal episodes (2.8% versus 1.4%, respectively, p = 0.03). Delayed morbidity of first and re-biopsy was comprised of fever (2.9% versus 2.3%, p = 0.08), hematospermia (9.8% versus 10.2%, p = 0.1), recurrent mild hematuria (15.9% versus 16.6%, p = 0.06), persistent dysuria (7.2% versus 6.8%, p = 0.12) and urinary tract infection (10.9% versus 11.3%, respectively, p = 0.07). Major complications were rare and included urosepsis (0.1% versus 0%) and rectal bleeding that required intervention (0% versus 0.1%, respectively). Furthermore, an age dependent pattern of pain apprehension during biopsy was observed with the highest scores in patients younger than 60 years.

Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is generally well tolerated with minor morbidity only rarely requiring treatment. Re-biopsy can be performed 6 weeks later with no significant difference in pain or morbidity. Patients younger than 60 years should be counseled in regard to a higher level of discomfort, and local and topical anesthesia if desired.

Citing Articles

Standardized prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates following initial non-malignant biopsy result.

Stroomberg H, Andersen M, Helgstrand J, Larsen S, Vickers A, Brasso K BJU Int. 2023; 132(2):181-187.

PMID: 36847603 PMC: 10765343. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15997.


Prostate cancer screening: Continued controversies and novel biomarker advancements.

Tidd-Johnson A, Sebastian S, Lorraine Co E, Afaq M, Kochhar H, Sheikh M Curr Urol. 2023; 16(4):197-206.

PMID: 36714234 PMC: 9875204. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000145.


Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.

Panzone J, Byler T, Bratslavsky G, Goldberg H Cancer Manag Res. 2022; 14:1209-1228.

PMID: 35345605 PMC: 8957299. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S265058.


Radiomics for Identification and Prediction in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Review of Studies.

Kendrick J, Francis R, Hassan G, Rowshanfarzad P, Jeraj R, Kasisi C Front Oncol. 2021; 11:771787.

PMID: 34790581 PMC: 8591174. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771787.


Endoscopic Therapy in the Management of Patients With Severe Rectal Bleeding Following Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Case-Based Systematic Review.

Malik A, Ishtiaq R, Goraya M, Inayat F, Gaduputi V J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2021; 9:23247096211013206.

PMID: 33969720 PMC: 8113366. DOI: 10.1177/23247096211013206.