» Articles » PMID: 11482706

3D Coronary Reconstruction from Routine Single-plane Coronary Angiograms: Clinical Validation and Quantitative Analysis of the Right Coronary Artery in 100 Patients

Overview
Date 2001 Aug 3
PMID 11482706
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current coronary angiographic techniques display complex three-dimensional (3D) coronary structures in two dimensions (2D). We have developed a 3D reconstruction (3DR) algorithm using standard single-plane angiographic images that allows for 3D display of coronary structures. The purpose of this study was to validate our 3DR algorithm and quantify anatomic characteristics of the right coronary artery (RCA) in vivo.

Methods: Accuracy and reproducibility studies were performed using 3DRs of a coronary phantom and in vivo following 3DRs in 40 patients. The anatomic features of the RCA were then quantified in 100 patients.

Results: Comparison of length and bifurcation angles (BA) from the phantom to the 3DRs revealed good accuracy and correlation for both (r = 0.95 and 0.93 respectively), with diameter error of < 7%. In vivo, the average root mean square (RMS) error in the spatial coordinates of the vessel centerlines was 3.12 +/- 0.77 and 3.16 +/- 0.75 mm in 20 left coronary arteries (LCA) and 20 RCAs respectively. Interobserver average RMS error was 3.47 +/- 1.96 mm and intraobserver average RMS error was 3.02 +/- 1.07 and 3.44 +/- 1.57 mm for two different operators (p = NS). The average RCA length was 10.2 +/- 1.7 cm, average radius of curvature (ROC) was 52 +/- 9 degrees, and the average 3D bifurcation angle of the posterior descending artery (PDA) from the RCA was 55 +/- 22 degrees. Foreshortening (FS) of the segments of the RCA in three 'standard' projections ranged from 0-60, 0-75, and 0-82% respectively.

Conclusions: Using our 3DR algorithm patient-specific anatomic characteristics can be accurately displayed and quantified, expanding the information that can be derived from routine coronary angiography.

Citing Articles

3D localization from 2D X-ray projection.

Bertsche D, Rasche V, Rottbauer W, Vernikouskaya I Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022; 17(9):1553-1558.

PMID: 35819654 PMC: 9463320. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02709-w.


Location-Specific Comparison Between a 3D In-Stent Restenosis Model and Micro-CT and Histology Data from Porcine In Vivo Experiments.

Zun P, Narracott A, Chiastra C, Gunn J, Hoekstra A Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2019; 10(4):568-582.

PMID: 31531821 PMC: 6863796. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-019-00431-4.


In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.

Zasada W, Slezak M, Pociask E, Malinowski K, Proniewska K, Buszman P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 35(2):215-223.

PMID: 30796556 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01529-5.


Structural Mechanics Predictions Relating to Clinical Coronary Stent Fracture in a 5 Year Period in FDA MAUDE Database.

Everett K, Conway C, Desany G, Baker B, Choi G, Taylor C Ann Biomed Eng. 2015; 44(2):391-403.

PMID: 26467552 PMC: 5082979. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1476-3.


Impact of the bifurcation angle on major cardiac events after cross-over single stent strategy in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis.

Amemiya K, Domei T, Iwabuchi M, Shirai S, Ando K, Goya M Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2015; 4(4):168-76.

PMID: 25628958 PMC: 4299691.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Klein J, Hoff J, Peifer J, Folks R, Cooke C, King 3rd S . A quantitative evaluation of the three dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries. Int J Card Imaging. 1998; 14(2):75-87. DOI: 10.1023/a:1005903705300. View

3.
Muhlestein J, Zhang Q, Parker D, Horn S, Parker D, Anderson J . A comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of digital three-dimensional coronary artery reconstructions using edge detection or videodensitometry. Comput Biomed Res. 1998; 30(6):415-26. DOI: 10.1006/cbmr.1997.1453. View

4.
Pellot C, Herment A, Sigelle M, Horain P, Maitre H, Peronneau P . A 3D reconstruction of vascular structures from two X-ray angiograms using an adapted simulated annealing algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994; 13(1):48-60. DOI: 10.1109/42.276144. View

5.
Gross M, FRIEDMAN M . Dynamics of coronary artery curvature obtained from biplane cineangiograms. J Biomech. 1998; 31(5):479-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00012-8. View