» Articles » PMID: 11477250

Repeatability of Quantitative CT Indexes of Emphysema in Patients Evaluated for Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2001 Jul 31
PMID 11477250
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of quantitative computed tomographic (CT) indexes of emphysema and the effect of spirometric gating of lung volume during CT in candidates for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

Materials And Methods: Initial and same-day repeat routine inspiratory spiral chest CT studies were performed in 29 LVRS candidates (group 1, routine study vs repeat study). In a separate cohort of 29 LVRS candidates, spiral chest CT studies were performed both without and with spirometric gating by using a spirometer to trigger scanning at 90% of vital capacity (group 2, spirometric gating study). In each study, Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the agreement between multiple pairs of whole-lung quantitative CT indexes of emphysema, and mean values were compared with two-tailed paired t tests.

Results: Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients were high for all quantitative CT indexes (all > or = 0.92). No significant differences were found between mean values of quantitative CT indexes in group 1. Variation in quantitative CT results was small but more prominent in group 2 than in group 1. The variation in quantitative CT results was primarily related to differences in lung volume (r(2) as great as 0.83).

Conclusion: Repeatability of quantitative CT test results in LVRS candidates is high and unlikely to improve by using spirometric gating.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of spirometry-gated computed tomography to measure lung volumes in emphysema patients.

Bakker J, Klooster K, Bouwman J, Jan Pelgrim G, Vliegenthart R, Slebos D ERJ Open Res. 2022; 8(1).

PMID: 35083322 PMC: 8784891. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00492-2021.


Measuring pulmonary function in COPD using quantitative chest computed tomography analysis.

Bakker J, Klooster K, Vliegenthart R, Slebos D Eur Respir Rev. 2021; 30(161).

PMID: 34261743 PMC: 9518001. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0031-2021.


Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.

Hatt C, Oh A, Obuchowski N, Charbonnier J, Lynch D, Humphries S Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 3(2):e200503.

PMID: 33969308 PMC: 8098098. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021200503.


Relationship between Emphysema Progression at CT and Mortality in Ever-Smokers: Results from the COPDGene and ECLIPSE Cohorts.

Ash S, San Jose Estepar R, Fain S, Tal-Singer R, Stockley R, Nordenmark L Radiology. 2021; 299(1):222-231.

PMID: 33591891 PMC: 7997617. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203531.


Emphysema Index Based on Hyperpolarized He or Xe Diffusion MRI: Performance and Comparison with Quantitative CT and Pulmonary Function Tests.

Tafti S, Garrison W, Mugler 3rd J, Shim Y, Altes T, Mata J Radiology. 2020; 297(1):201-210.

PMID: 32779976 PMC: 7526952. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192804.