» Articles » PMID: 11473372

Accuracy of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Predicting Nodal Status in Patients with Breast Carcinoma

Overview
Journal J Surg Oncol
Date 2001 Jul 27
PMID 11473372
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: While sentinel lymph node biopsy is considered by many to have replaced axillary node dissection in the management of breast cancer, concerns remain regarding false-negative results.

Methods: To investigate the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy, we reexamined all sentinel and nonsentinel nodes with multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemical staining in 42 consecutive cases of breast cancer in which sentinel node biopsy was performed and followed by axillary dissection.

Results: By routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, 34% of patients were found to be node positive, with no cases of false-negative sentinel node biopsy. Reevaluation of 775 negative sentinel and nonsentinel nodes with an additional two levels and immunohistochemistry identified three "node-negative" patients who had micrometastases in the sentinel node, increasing detection in 8% of cases. More important, is the fact however, that there were no cases where additional sections and immunohistochemistry identified metastases in nonsentinel nodes that had bypassed the sentinel node. The accuracy of the sentinel node in predicting the nodal status was 100%.

Conclusions: Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry will identify more patients with nodal micrometastases; however, it was unable to identify any cases where micrometastases were present in nonsentinel nodes when the sentinel node was negative. The status of the sentinel node accurately identifies the status of the axillary basin.

Citing Articles

The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Pesek S, Ashikaga T, Krag L, Krag D World J Surg. 2012; 36(9):2239-51.

PMID: 22569745 PMC: 3469260. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1623-z.


Predicting the risk for additional axillary metastases in patients with breast carcinoma and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Viale G, Maiorano E, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua M, Valentini S, Galimberti V Ann Surg. 2005; 241(2):319-25.

PMID: 15650643 PMC: 1356918. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150255.30665.52.


Sentinel lymph node mapping for primary breast cancer.

Wilson L, Giuliano A Curr Oncol Rep. 2004; 7(1):12-7.

PMID: 15610681 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-005-0020-2.


A model for determining the optimum histology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Cserni G J Clin Pathol. 2004; 57(5):467-71.

PMID: 15113852 PMC: 1770292. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.014308.


Effect of lymphatic mapping on diagnosis and treatment of patients with T1a, T1b favorable breast cancer.

Jakub J, Ebert M, Diaz N, Cantor A, Reintgen D, Dupont E Ann Surg. 2003; 237(6):838-41; discussion 841-3.

PMID: 12796580 PMC: 1514680. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000071564.27229.A9.