» Articles » PMID: 11462083

An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of a Hydroxyapatite Cement for Use with Vertebroplasty

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2001 Jul 20
PMID 11462083
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Comparative ex vivo biomechanical study.

Objective: To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and stabilized via bipedicular injections of the following: 1) Simplex P (Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics, Rutherford, NJ), 2) Simplex P formulated consistent with the practice of vertebroplasty (F2), or 3) BoneSource (Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics).

Summary Of Background Data: Little is known about the mechanical stabilization afforded by new materials proposed for use with vertebroplasty.

Methods: Vertebral bodies (T8-T10 and L2-L4) from each of 10 fresh spines were harvested from female cadavers (81 +/- 12 years), screened for bone density (t score, -3.8 +/- 1.1; bone mineral density, 0.75 +/- 15 g/cm2), disarticulated, and compressed to determine initial strength and stiffness. The fractured vertebral bodies were stabilized via bipedicular injections of 4 mL (thoracic) or 6 mL (lumbar) and then recrushed.

Results: Vertebral bodies repaired with Simplex P resulted in significantly greater strength (P < 0.05) relative to their prefracture states, those repaired with BoneSource resulted in the restoration of initial strength for both the thoracic and lumbar level, and those repaired with F2 resulted in significantly greater strength (P < 0.05) in the thoracic region and restoration of strength in the lumbar region. All cement treatments resulted in significantly less stiffness compared with initial values.

Conclusions: All three materials tested restored or increased vertebral body strength, but none restored stiffness. Both new materials show promise for use in percutaneous vertebroplasty, but they need clinical evaluation.

Citing Articles

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid Combined with PVP/PKP in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sun Y, Ma H, Yang F, Tang X, Yi P, Tan M Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:6650358.

PMID: 33928158 PMC: 8049795. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6650358.


Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Zhu R, Kan S, Ning G, Chen L, Cao Z, Jiang Z Osteoporos Int. 2019; 30(2):287-298.

PMID: 30635698 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4804-2.


Network meta-analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty, nerve block, and conservative treatment for nonsurgery options of acute/subacute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in short-term and....

Zuo X, Zhu X, Bao H, Xu C, Chen H, Gao X Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(29):e11544.

PMID: 30024546 PMC: 6086478. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011544.


A 3D finite element model of prophylactic vertebroplasty in the metastatic spine: Vertebral stability and stress distribution on adjacent vertebrae.

Berton A, Salvatore G, Giambini H, Ciuffreda M, Longo U, Denaro V J Spinal Cord Med. 2018; 43(1):39-45.

PMID: 29446706 PMC: 7006681. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1432309.


The impact of endplate fracture on postoperative vertebral height loss and kyphotic deformity during treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with balloon kyphoplasty.

Li Q, Xiao L, Zhang J, Fan J, Zhou W, Yin G J Biomed Res. 2016; 30(5):419-426.

PMID: 27845305 PMC: 5044714. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150071.