» Articles » PMID: 11446312

Cohort Studies: History of the Method. I. Prospective Cohort Studies

Overview
Date 2001 Jul 12
PMID 11446312
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The term "cohort study" was introduced by Frost in 1935 to describe a study that compared the disease experience of people born at different periods, in particular the sex and age specific incidence of tuberculosis and the method was extended to the study of non-communicable disease by Korteweg who used it 20 years later to analyse the epidemic of lung cancer in the Netherlands. Such studies are now best described as generation studies or generation cohort studies to distinguish them from the common type of study that is now carried out that consists in defining groups of individuals distinguished by some variable (such as place of residence, occupation, behaviour, or environmental exposure) and following them up to see if the incidence or mortality rates vary with the selected variable. This type of study is now one of the most important tools for epidemiological investigation. Initially called prospective studies, because the information characterising the individuals in the cohorts was recorded before the onset of disease, they are now preferably called cohort studies and distinguished as prospective cohort studies, If the information obtained relates to the subjects at the time the study is started and they are then followed, or retrospective cohort studies, if the information characterising the individuals was recorded sometime in the past (for example, the receipt of radiotherapy, or entry to a specific occupation). Studies of either type have the great advantage that they avoid all the most important sources of bias that may affect case-control-studies, but the disadvantage that because incidence rates and more specifically mortality rates are commonly low, large numbers of subjects have to be followed for several (if not many) years to obtain statistically significant results. Several early prospective studies are described: Namely, those of 34,000 male British doctors, 190,000 male and female American citizens with different smoking habits, some 5,000 middle aged residents of Framingham with different blood pressures, blood cholesterol levels, etc, and 13,000 children born in the UK in one week in 1946 with different family backgrounds.

Citing Articles

The impact of enteric coating of aspirin on aspirin responsiveness in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed ischemic stroke: prospective cohort study: results from the (ECASIS) study.

Elshafei M, Imam Y, Alsaud A, Chandra P, Parray A, Abdelmoneim M Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(11):1801-1811.

PMID: 36121499 PMC: 9546947. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03391-2.


Methodological considerations in establishing and maintaining longitudinal health workforce studies: Lessons learned from the WiSDOM cohort in South Africa.

Rispel L, Ditlopo P, White J, Blaauw D Glob Health Action. 2021; 14(1):1996688.

PMID: 34927577 PMC: 8725765. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1996688.


From the Roman Empire to the New Millennium. Data access and sharing from healthy ageing cohorts.

Gambaro E, Gramaglia C, Faggiano F, Zeppegno P Prev Med Rep. 2020; 20:101186.

PMID: 32939333 PMC: 7479283. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101186.


The Changing Science of HIV Epidemiology in the United States.

DSouza G, Golub E, Gange S Am J Epidemiol. 2019; 188(12):2061-2068.

PMID: 31595945 PMC: 7036648. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz211.


The protocol of a population-based prospective cohort study in southwest of Iran to analyze common non-communicable diseases: Shahrekord cohort study.

Khaledifar A, Hashemzadeh M, Solati K, Poustchi H, Bollati V, Ahmadi A BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):660.

PMID: 29801446 PMC: 5970455. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5364-2.


References
1.
Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, Youngman L, Collins R, Marmot M . Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150(4):341-53. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010013. View

2.
DOLL R, Hill A . The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. Br Med J. 1954; 1(4877):1451-5. PMC: 2085438. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451. View

3.
HAMMOND E, Horn D . The relationship between human smoking habits and death rates: a follow-up study of 187,766 men. J Am Med Assoc. 1954; 155(15):1316-28. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1954.03690330020006. View

4.
DOLL R, Hill A . Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking; a second report on the mortality of British doctors. Br Med J. 1956; 2(5001):1071-81. PMC: 2035864. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5001.1071. View

5.
DOLL R, Hill A . MORTALITY IN RELATION TO SMOKING: TEN YEARS' OBSERVATIONS OF BRITISH DOCTORS. Br Med J. 1964; 1(5395):1399-410. PMC: 1814562. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5395.1399. View