» Articles » PMID: 11441445

Ontogeny Constrains Systemic Protease Inhibitor Response in Nicotiana Attenuata

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2001 Jul 10
PMID 11441445
Citations 119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protease inhibitors (PIs) are plant compounds that can inhibit proteases of mammal, insect, or pathogen origin and are frequently induced by mechanical wounding, insect feeding, or pathogen infection. Nicotiana attenuata is a species that induces nicotine, volatiles, and phenolics in response to damage. Here we examine the distribution of PIs in N. attenuata to determine if they are part of the induced response in this species and if this response is ontogenetically constrained. We found that N. attenuata shoot extracts inhibited trypsin (Tryp) and chymotrypsin (Chym) activities, while root extracts inhibited Tryp, Chym, and the bacterial protease subtilisin (Sub). The highest TrypPI levels were found at midday in the source-sink transition leaf, while older or younger leaves contained lower TrypPI levels and did not show significant diurnal fluctuations. Rosette plants, bolting plants, and flowering plants all contained TrypPIs in leaves, stems, and flowers, while seed capsules, seeds, and young seedlings did not contain any PIs. PIs in N. attenuata rosette plants were induced by Manduca sexta larval feeding, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment, wounding, and application of M. sexta oral secretion and regurgitant. The response to MeJA application was stronger and longer lasting than to mechanical wounding. The direction and magnitude of the systemic response to mechanical wounding or larval damage depended on the age of the leaf that was damaged and the frequency of wounding. The systemic signal for TrypPI induction appears to follow source-sink relations in the plant and to be regulated by the octadecanoid pathway. Interestingly, by the time plants reach the flowering stage, they had lost the ability to increase PI levels after MeJA treatment. We concluded that plant ontogeny constrains both constitutive and inducible PI production in N. attenuata.

Citing Articles

Nymphal feeding suppresses oviposition-induced indirect plant defense in rice.

Li J, Liu X, Xiao W, Huangfu J, Schuman M, Baldwin I Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):508.

PMID: 39779696 PMC: 11711504. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55816-y.


A Nucleotide-Binding Domain Leucine-Rich Repeat Gene Regulates Plant Growth and Defense Against Chewing Herbivores.

Qiu C, Jin X, Zhao Y, Kuai P, Lou Y Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39683068 PMC: 11644264. DOI: 10.3390/plants13233275.


Heat stress reprograms herbivory-induced defense responses in potato plants.

Zhong J, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Ge Y, He W, Liang C BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):677.

PMID: 39014327 PMC: 11253553. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05404-x.


Resistance to during Different Plant Life Stages and under Different Environmental Conditions in the Ornamental Gladiolus.

Wahyuni D, Klinkhamer P, Choi Y, Leiss K Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38475533 PMC: 10935247. DOI: 10.3390/plants13050687.


Rice responds to Spodoptera frugiperda infestation via epigenetic regulation of H3K9ac in the jasmonic acid signaling and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways.

Xue R, Guo R, Li Q, Lin T, Wu Z, Gao N Plant Cell Rep. 2024; 43(3):78.

PMID: 38393406 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-024-03160-8.


References
1.
Bolter C, Jongsma M . The adaptation of insects to plant protease inhibitors. J Insect Physiol. 2003; 43(10):885-895. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00040-1. View

2.
Fusek M, Baudys M, Metcalf P . Purification and crystallization of human cathepsin D. J Mol Biol. 1992; 226(2):555-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90968-p. View

3.
Lee M, Scanlon M, Craik D, Anderson M . A novel two-chain proteinase inhibitor generated by circularization of a multidomain precursor protein. Nat Struct Biol. 1999; 6(6):526-30. DOI: 10.1038/9293. View

4.
Reymond P, Farmer E . Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999; 1(5):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80264-1. View

5.
Halitschke R, Kessler A, Kahl J, Lorenz A, Baldwin I . Ecophysiological comparison of direct and indirect defenses in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia. 2017; 124(3):408-417. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000389. View