» Articles » PMID: 11434393

The Friedewald Formula Underestimates LDL Cholesterol at Low Concentrations

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Pathology
Date 2001 Jul 4
PMID 11434393
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to recent advances in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations below 2.6 mmol/l have become attainable. In general, LDL cholesterol is determined indirectly according to Friedewald. We examined the performance of the Friedewald formula at low concentrations of LDL cholesterol in comparison with a beta-quantification method. We analyzed 176 samples from individuals treated by LDL apheresis with a mean LDL cholesterol concentration of 3.07 mmol/l and found that the Friedewald formula underestimated LDL cholesterol with a bias of -18.5%, -14.5%, -7.3%, and -3.8% at mean LDL cholesterol levels of 1.58, 2.4, 3.49, and 4.67 mmol/l, respectively. Thus, the lower the LDL cholesterol concentration was, the greater the negative bias. We conclude that the Friedewald formula may not be reliable at low LDL cholesterol concentrations produced by LDL apheresis. This finding may also be of relevance to the monitoring of patients being treated with lipid lowering drugs.

Citing Articles

Dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load in relation to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study.

Motamedi A, Alizadeh S, Osati S, Raeisi T, Homayounfar R Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e182.

PMID: 39324343 PMC: 11504692. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001149.


Association between Mediterranean-dietary approaches to stop hypertension intervention for neurodegenerative delay diet and biomarkers of oxidative stress, metabolic factors, disease severity, and odds of disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Safaei M, Kheirouri S, Alizadeh M, Pirovi A Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(6):3973-3981.

PMID: 38873478 PMC: 11167176. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4055.


[Laboratory diagnostics of lipid metabolism disorders].

Marz W, Scharnagl H, Kleber M, Silbernagel G, Nauck M, Muller-Wieland D Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023; 148(23):e120-e146.

PMID: 37949074 PMC: 10637831. DOI: 10.1055/a-1516-2511.


Assessing the Practical Differences in LDL-C Estimates Calculated by Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or NIH Equation 2: An Observation Cross-Sectional Study.

Wang I, Rahman M, Hou S, Lin H J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023; 12(3):252-266.

PMID: 37800109 PMC: 10548185. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252.


Comparison of measured LDL cholesterol with calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae in diabetic adults at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital/NHLS Laboratory.

Dintshi M, Kone N, Khoza S PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0277981.

PMID: 36516155 PMC: 9749991. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277981.