Comparison of Ivermectin, Doramectin, Selamectin, and Eleven Intermediates in a Nematode Larval Development Assay
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Chemical substitutions at pharmacologically relevant sites such as C-5, C-13, C-22,23, and C-25 were examined in ivermectin, doramectin, selamectin, and a series of 11 other intermediates using a larval development assay with Haemonchus contortus. A range of activities spanning 5 orders of magnitude were manifest with small changes in the substituents to the 14 avermectins. Within this compound series, there was no major potency advantage or disadvantage to a disaccharide over a monosaccharide substituent at C-13. Ivermectin and doramectin were each fully effective at a concentration of 0.001 microg/ml, and both were similar to their respective monosaccharide homologs. Specific patterns emerged among the analogs with substituents at C-5. Analogs possessing hydroxyl groups at C-5 were superior in activity by several orders of magnitude over those with oxo substituents. Replacement of the oxo with an oxime (NOH) restored activity to some degree but did not restore it to the level of those possessing the hydroxyl substituent. Consequently, ivermectin and doramectin that possess hydroxyl moieties at C-5 were superior against H. contortus to those like selamectin that have oxime substituents. There was no advantage for analogs with a single or double bond at C-22,23 within the cyclohexyl series, and these analogs had equivalent activity as those with a single bond at C-22,23 in the sec-butyl/isopropyl series. However, there was superior activity for the analog series that possessed the combination of a double-bond at C-22,23 and a sec-butyl/isopropyl substituent at C-25. As a result, the most potent compound in this test was not any of the 3 commercialized avermectins but was a monosaccharide with a double bond at C-22,23, an hydroxyl at C-5, and a sec-butyl/isopropyl moiety at C-25.
Structural Elucidation of Ivermectin Binding to α7nAChR and the Induced Channel Desensitization.
Bondarenko V, Chen Q, Singewald K, Haloi N, Tillman T, Howard R ACS Chem Neurosci. 2023; 14(6):1156-1165.
PMID: 36821490 PMC: 10020961. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00783.
Positive Allosteric Modulators of Glycine Receptors and Their Potential Use in Pain Therapies.
Gallagher C, Ha D, Harvey R, Vandenberg R Pharmacol Rev. 2023; 74(4):933-961.
PMID: 36779343 PMC: 9553105. DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000583.
Phenotypic Profiling of Macrocyclic Lactones on Parasitic Flatworms.
Ryan K, Wheeler N, Kamara I, Johnson H, Humphries J, Zamanian M Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023; 67(2):e0123022.
PMID: 36695583 PMC: 9933704. DOI: 10.1128/aac.01230-22.
Atif M, Smith J, Estrada-Mondragon A, Xiao X, Salim A, Capon R PLoS Pathog. 2019; 15(1):e1007570.
PMID: 30695069 PMC: 6368337. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007570.
Chen I, Kubo Y J Physiol. 2017; 596(10):1833-1845.
PMID: 29063617 PMC: 5978302. DOI: 10.1113/JP275236.