» Articles » PMID: 11425822

Training of Providers in Embryo Transfer: What is the Minimum Number of Transfers Required for Proficiency?

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 2001 Jun 27
PMID 11425822
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Embryo transfer represents one of the most critical procedures in the practice of assisted reproduction. The objective of this study was to identify retrospectively the minimum number of embryo transfers required to train providers properly in this skill.

Methods And Results: The study group consisted of 204 patients who received embryo transfers between January 1996 and March 2000 in a university-based programme of assisted reproduction. The main outcome measure was clinical pregnancies per embryo transfer. Five Fellow trainees performed a total of 204 embryo transfers for an overall pregnancy rate of 45.5% per embryo transfer (93/204). In comparison, the programme pregnancy rate per transfer for experienced providers was 47.3% (560/1179). A chronological graph of each individual trainee's experience for the first 50 embryo transfers performed suggested a lower initial pregnancy rate for three of the five trainees. To determine whether a learning curve might exist, results of the first 25 transfers were compared as a subgroup with the second 25 transfers. Pregnancy rates were lower for the 1-25 transfer subgroup than in the 26-50 subgroup for three of the five Fellow trainees, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Clinical pregnancy rates of Fellows-in-training were indistinguishable statistically from those of experienced staff by 50 transfers.

Citing Articles

A standardized training allows achieving similar clinical pregnancy rates per top-quality euploid blastocyst transfer across operators.

Ruffa A, Cimadomo D, Pittana E, Innocenti F, Taggi M, Colamaria S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39841344 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03396-7.


Is There Any Effect of the Physician Performing Embryo Transfer in IVF-ICSI Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Ozturk Inal Z, Inal H, Aksoy E, Mermer S Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022; 44(1):19-24.

PMID: 35092955 PMC: 9948127. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740473.


Letter to Editor: We Need Standardized Guidelines for Laboratory Tissue Processing After Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction.

Salama N Reprod Sci. 2021; 28(8):2071-2075.

PMID: 33871827 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00585-4.


The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome?.

Cirillo F, Patrizio P, Baccini M, Morenghi E, Ronchetti C, Cafaro L Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(2):275-282.

PMID: 32100020 PMC: 7048715. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez290.


Public reporting of IVF outcomes influences medical decision-making and physician training.

Gunderson S, Jungheim E, Kallen C, Omurtag K Fertil Res Pract. 2020; 6:1.

PMID: 32071729 PMC: 7014742. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-020-00070-7.