» Articles » PMID: 11418411

Preoperative Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors with MR Imaging: Comparison with Transvaginal Sonography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Histologic Findings

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2001 Jun 22
PMID 11418411
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our study evaluated the diagnostic performance of MR imaging compared with that of transvaginal sonography and positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with clinically asymptomatic adnexal findings. An additional goal was to determine whether the combination of the three methods enhanced their diagnostic accuracy.

Subjects And Methods: Included in the study were 103 women with suspicious adnexal findings on sonography. Patients underwent transvaginal sonography, MR imaging, and PET within 3 weeks of the initial sonography. For MR imaging, axial and sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences (unenhanced and enhanced) and T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences were acquired. Transvaginal sonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz transducer head. For PET, a modern full-ring scanner was used. The results of diagnostic imaging techniques were first evaluated separately, and reviewers were blinded to the results of other methods. Finally, a second session resulted in a consensus diagnosis based on the findings of all three methods. Results of histology were considered the gold standard.

Results: Histology revealed 12 malignant and 91 benign ovarian tumors. The following data were calculated for MR imaging, transvaginal sonography, PET, and consensus diagnosis: sensitivities, 83%, 92%, 58%, 92%; specificities, 84%, 59%, 78%, 84%; diagnostic accuracies, 83%, 63%, 76%, 85%, respectively. MR imaging, particularly with contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted sequences, was found to correctly reveal dermoid and endometrial cysts. All three methods had false-negative findings with borderline tumors.

Conclusion: Transvaginal sonography is the diagnostic method of choice as a screening technique for ovarian processes. Suspicious findings on transvaginal sonography should be confirmed on MR imaging. If MR imaging confirms a dermoid or endometrial cyst, further diagnostic procedures may be unnecessary. In all other cases, a surgical evaluation must be considered.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours: data from a London tertiary centre.

Mitchell S, Gleeson J, Tiwari M, Bailey F, Gaughran J, Mehra G BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):50.

PMID: 39516671 PMC: 11523981. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00068-4.


Relaxed fibronectin: a potential novel target for imaging endometriotic lesions.

Trachsel B, Imobersteg S, Valpreda G, Singer G, Grabherr R, Ormos M EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):17.

PMID: 38340184 PMC: 10858858. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01070-0.


Current Update on PET/MRI in Gynecological Malignancies-A Review of the Literature.

Virarkar M, Vulasala S, Calimano-Ramirez L, Singh A, Lall C, Bhosale P Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(1):1077-1105.

PMID: 36661732 PMC: 9858166. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010083.


Current and Emerging Methods for Ovarian Cancer Screening and Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review.

Liberto J, Chen S, Shih I, Wang T, Wang T, Pisanic 2nd T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 35740550 PMC: 9221480. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122885.


Evaluation of a CD13 and Integrin αβ Dual-Receptor Targeted Tracer Ga-NGR-RGD for Ovarian Tumor Imaging: Comparison With F-FDG.

Long Y, Shao F, Ji H, Song X, Lv X, Xia X Front Oncol. 2022; 12:884554.

PMID: 35664759 PMC: 9158524. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.884554.