Misoprostol Induction of Labor Among Women with a History of Cesarean Delivery
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Several reports have appeared of uterine rupture among women with a history of cesarean delivery who received misoprostol for induction of labor. A recent review suggested a uterine rupture rate of almost 6%, but the experience at our institution did not seem to reflect this high complication rate. This study was undertaken to compare complications of labor induction with misoprostol between women with a history of cesarean delivery and women without uterine scarring.
Study Design: A computerized database was used to select women with a viable fetus who underwent induction of labor with misoprostol during the period from January 1996 through December 1998. Patients were given 50 microg misoprostol every 4 hours. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were retrospectively compared with those without uterine scarring.
Results: A total of 425 women were given misoprostol for induction of labor: 48 had a history of cesarean delivery and 377 did not. Women with a history of cesarean delivery were more likely to be delivered abdominally (56% vs 28%; P <.04). Among women with a history of cesarean delivery, women who had a history of vaginal birth after cesarean were more likely to be delivered vaginally (92% vs 42%; P =.003). There was no difference in the overall rate of complications (2% with scarring vs 3% without scarring). There were no uterine ruptures. However, the previous cesarean group was more likely than the unscarred group to have blood loss >500 mL (38% vs 22%; P <.03). Although the incidences of fetal distress were similar, neonates born to women in the previous cesarean group were more likely to have an Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (13% vs 5%; P <.04).
Conclusion: Misoprostol induction of labor in women with a history of cesarean resulted in a higher rate of cesarean delivery than was seen among women without uterine scarring but was not associated with a higher incidence of complications. There were no uterine ruptures in either group.
Does feticide shorten termination duration in second trimester pregnancy terminations?.
Sik A, Bilecan S, Kumbasar S, Akpak Y, Aba Y Afr Health Sci. 2019; 19(1):1544-1553.
PMID: 31148982 PMC: 6531983. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.28.
Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
West H, Jozwiak M, Dodd J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6:CD009792.
PMID: 28599068 PMC: 6481365. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3.
Garba I, Muhammed A, Muhammad Z, Galadanci H, Ayyuba R, Abubakar I Ann Afr Med. 2016; 15(3):114-9.
PMID: 27549415 PMC: 5402811. DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.188890.
ElSalem S, AlSaad D, Abdulrouf P, Ahmed A, AlHail M Qatar Med J. 2016; 2016(1):5.
PMID: 27413719 PMC: 4928105. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2016.5.
Misoprostol for Labour Induction after Previous Caesarean Section - Forever a "No Go"?.
Rath W, Tsikouras P Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016; 75(11):1140-1147.
PMID: 26719597 PMC: 4678051. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558171.